Should Banning of Same-sex Marriages be in the US Constituti
Over the course of the last twenty to thirty years, it has slowly become more socially acceptable to admit one's homosexuality. Until recently, gays have typically had to hide their sexuality. Today, mainstream television shows, commercials, sports stars, politicians, etc., have helped increase the awareness of gays and lesbians and made it more socially acceptable. Social acceptance has been one of the first giant leaps for people in this lifestyle. The next step for homosexual couples is their want for a "legal union" between one another so that they can not only be married, but be eligible for the same federal aid offered to heterosexual couples. There has been much debate over the issue of whether or not same sex marriages should be legal and whether or not marriage performed in one state is eligible to be carried over to another state and still be considered a legal sanction, this debate has gone so far that that there is talk of banning it in the federal constitution of the United States of America. Given the importance of this issue, the value of this comprehensive debate may be obvious. Marriage is considered
Many Americans view marriage foremost as a religious rite. The binding of two men or two women into holy matrimony and extend to them the same rights, “it compromises what marriage is all about, which goes back again to the foundation that biblically God designed for a man and a woman,” says Cheryl Nash of Boston Massachusetts . These are the feelings of many Americans, polls done by CBS, LA Times, and other new sources showed an average of 45-55% disapproval of gay and lesbian marriages. In an interview done by myself on this topic blahh blahh On the other side comes the issue of why gays should be allowed to get married. Proponents of same-sex marriages argue that first off, "It is wrong to write discrimination into the U.S. Constitution, and it is shameful to use attacks against gay and lesbian families as an election strategy," claims Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe. Gay rights groups are seeing the measures beginning to be taken as a way to make the gays second class citizens. Many are even beginning to see this issue as a way for President Bush to take the lime light off of what is g
Some topics in this essay:
,
United America,
Massachusetts California,
LA Times,
President Bush’s,
Campaign Americans,
Scott King,
Massachusetts Supreme,
Marriage Act,
McAuliffe Gay,
marriages legal,
socially acceptable,
legal union,
homosexual couples,
gay lesbian,
sex marriages,
same-sex marriages,
sex marriages legal,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 761
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
