Respomce to "Who gets in"

While my initial reaction was one of shock of the immigration system, in accordance with the intentions of the film, my emotions were misplaced. The shock was generated not at the information given by the filmmakers, but at my lack of knowledge on the subject. The system seemed harsh, and unjust, not a system that a fir

Watching the ease at which the immigration officials dismissed and rejected cases seems heartless and uncaring. One would expect an in-depth review of each case, and an informed decision to be made verbatim. Instead, folders are tossed aside with nothing more than quick glimpses, and pitiless comments. You are told that certain jobs were at one time in great demand, but are no longer needed. The applicant has applied too late, and has missed his/her chance. You are shown the daily practices of the officials without scenes cut or edited. This gives you an inside view, and a candid look at the true inner workings of the immigration system. Instead of shock at the actions of the officials, you learn to understand the enormous work load that they have to deal with, and their reasoning for their actions.

st world nation such as Canada would have in place. Actions taken by immigration officials seemed heartless and stereotypical, not based on any discernable reasoning. This fashioned contempt not only for the system, but for the officia

Some topics in this essay:
Hong Kong, Canada Actions, Peter Stevens, Canada Instead, , immigration system, immigration officials, intended purpose film, current system, purpose film, intentions film, unjust system, reasoning actions, intended purpose, system currently,