Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions. This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim and considers whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rational beings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it to be a universal law. Once it is clear that the maxim passes both prongs of the test, there are no exceptions. As a paramedic faced with a distraught widow who asks whether her late husband suffered in his accidental death, you must decide which maxim to create and based on the test which action to perform. The maxim "when answering a widow’s inquiry as to the nature and duration of her late husbands death, one should always tell the truth regarding the nature of her late husband’s death" (M1) passes both parts of the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative. Consequently, according to Kant, M1 is a moral action. The initial stage of the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative requires that a maxim be universally applicable to all rational beings. M1 succeeds in passing the first stage. We can easily ima

Some topics in this essay:
Categorical Imperative, Unlike Kantian, Utilitarianism Utilitarianism, universal law, categorical imperative, Kant M1, moral action, Law Formation, Universal Law, Formation Categorical, universal law formation, law formation categorical, formation categorical, law formation, telling truth, formation categorical imperative, Imperative Kantian, maxim universal, tell truth, spare feelings, maxim universal law, Imperative Consequently, telling truth moral, action moral, Mill’s Utilitarianism,