Scalia has a very impressive professional resume; his legal career began in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1962. By 1967 he decided to change professions to and taught law at the University of Virginia for four years (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/justices/scalia.bio.html). Scalia made a good impression among his a

Wal-Mart contracted Judy-Philippine to manufacture a line of children?s clothing, they sent her some pictures of Samara?s designs and Judy-Philippine copied the designs with only minor modifications. In 1996, Wal-Mart sold the knock-offs and generated more than $1.15 million in profits. Samara brothers filed suit against Wal-Mart Stores for copyright infringement, consumer fraud and unfair competition. After a weeklong trial, Samara was awarded approximately $1.6 million in damages, interest, costs and fees. (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-150.ZO.html). Wal-Mart appealed.

There is no one definition of what it takes to make a good Justice of the Supreme Court. Justices should be fair and in tune with what the law states and be able to interpret it. In my opinion, I think good Justices should know and keep up with current events related to the law; this usually comes from career experience serving as an attorney. A good educational background is a must as well as having a good reputation among your peers.

In 1986,

Some topics in this essay:
Justice Scalia, Antonin Scalia, BROTHERS Wal-Mart, Lanham Act, Wal-Mart Stores, Court Justices, Policy Nixon, University Virginia, Catherine Scalia, Francis Xavier, schultz 1996, supreme court, nominated scalia, wal-mart stores, school graduated, smith 1993, court justice, samara brothers, justice scalia, 1996 wal-mart,