Machiavelli
When one first reads Machiavelli?s ?small volume? (Dedicatory Letter 3) entitled The Prince, a typical reaction is one of disgust for what some describe as brutal, deceitful, and immoral political methods and principles. Some take offense to his disregard for Judeo-Christian ethics and for his lack of reference to God and divine law. Machiavelli clearly does not deal with the ideal case, but is fascinated rather with how people realistically act, be it in times of depravity or times of peace and opulence, his major concern is that of true human nature. However, in thoroughly reading and re-reading one finds principles which are paradoxical to his central concern with power politics, and in assessing to what degree his writing is truly ?Machiavellian? lies the key to understanding The Prince. In Chapter Three we see the onset of Machiavelli?s brutal reasoning. He says in regard to recently capturing a principality, ?To hold [the inhabitants] securely, it is enough to wipe out the family of the ruler who held sway over [the inhabitants]?? (Machiavelli 8). This exemplifies ?Machiavellian? reasoning by showing his disregard for ethics when it conflicts with the end result. In other words, Machiavelli is more concerned with
Within this chapter, as well as throughout the text, we also see a notion that cannot be considered brutal or immoral. In the beginning of the chapter Machiavelli stresses the importance of having friends and winning the affection of the people. ?For even if one possesses very strong armies, the goodwill of the inhabitants is always necessary?? (Machiavelli 7). In Chapter 19 we also see this same philosophy applied when Machiavelli stresses the importance of having a good reputation with the people. ?? A ruler ? should avoid anything that will make him either hated or despised.? Perhaps more important than any single observation or principle is the spirit in which Machiavelli wrote ?The Prince?. Most importantly, Machiavelli described society as he saw it rather than as he thought it should have been. Thus, he broke the long-standing link between the study of social and political science and the study of ethics or moral philosophy, unknowingly beginning the age of Modernity. Social scientists since Machiavelli have, had ethical concerns, of course, but they have a propensity to focus on the study of society rather than to the construction of ethical systems, and they have tried to separate their ethical concerns from their examination of the data: a practice at which Machiavelli clearly excelled.
Some topics in this essay:
Prince Chapter,
Fortuna Machiavelli,
Dedicatory Letter,
Republics Chapter,
Modernity Social,
,
machiavelli stresses importance,
stresses importance,
political power prince,
disregard ethics,
machiavelli stresses,
power prince,
inhabitants machiavelli,
prince chapter,
ethics morality,
ethical concerns,
political power,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 885
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Machiavelli Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|