Federalist Papers
Alexander Hamilton wanted to help the ratification of the ‘new’ Constitution, in 1787, so he decided that he would write and publish articles in order to explain the concepts of this Constitution. James Madison and John Jay were two other contributors that Hamilton added to help defend the new Constitution by writing articles as well. Although they are not part of the Constitution or legal documents, The Federalists Papers gained much popularity in the midst of the ratification of the Constitution. However, the ratification occurred with a small influence from these arguments. These Papers have been very important in American history because of the vital and genuine explanation of the Constitution. The Publius, pseudonym for the writers, describes certain concepts that were considered very crucial to the government. These concepts consisted of human lives, interests, federalism, and separation of powers. The Federalist Papers are best interpreted and understood through a republican argument and republican guidelines than those of democracy or other conflicting views. What are the concepts of a republic or republican argument? The Federalist No. 39 goes on to define the concept of a republic
The Framer’s of the Constitution had certain type of government and how it would run in their minds while they constructed what is now our Constitution. Though we the people believe we are run by a democratic government, the real intent by these Framer’s was the make the establishment more of a republic than that of a democracy. From the guidelines mentioned in the Papers, there is a strong argument that does suggest this republican argument as an accurate interpretation of the Constitution. There have been suggestions that maybe these Papers embrace more of an anti-democratic or a pluralist interpretation, but the structure of these types of thoughts are completely different than those set forth by the Publius. The Pluralist theory simply goes against everything argued in these documents because one of their views on the government and how it should work does not comply with the thought of majority vote or equal representation. Pluralists believe that there are too many offices, branches etc. that are governing for any group to try and influence it or govern. Another thought is that “pluralists do not argue that political resources are distributed equally- that would be tantamount to saying that all are decisions are made on majoritarian basis”(Wilson DiIulio 10). In other words, their thoughts on ruling are that it is divided among certain elites. This whole concept is depleted in No. 39 when Madison describes that it is “essential to such a government that it (delegation of powers) be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion, or a favored class of it…”(Madison No.39). The other theory that is considered a possible way to interpret the Papers is that of anti-democratic. This theory, as well as the Pluralist view, is completely far-fetched from reality. The anti-democratic ideas are pretty much exactly what the name says: they were against a democratic state. Instead of having power s
Some topics in this essay:
Federalists Papers,
Publius Pluralist,
Federalist Papers,
Framer’s Constitution,
James Madison,
Madison No10,
Madison Hamilton,
Constitution Publius,
Madison’s Hamilton’s,
Alexander Hamilton,
government run,
republican argument,
federalists papers,
national level,
directly indirectly,
people understand,
james madison,
separation powers,
people federalism,
democratic government,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1316
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Federalist Papers Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|