The Kantian Theory of Ethics relays upon the concept of the Categorical Imperative, or the process of universalization. Kant describes taking a possible action, a maxim, and testing whether it is morally permissible for a person to act in that manner by seeing if it would be morally permissible for all people in all times to act in that same manner. Thus, Kant says an action is morally permissible in one instance if the action is universally permissible in all instances. In fact, parts of the theory even say that it is one’s moral duty to act on these universalizable maxims, and that people should

Some criticism raised states that some maxims cannot be universalized, yet it does not seem morally wrong to act on them. The main issue with these objections seems to be that Kant’s theory breaks down to some extent in certain situations. However, it becomes possible that by further analyzing the situation at hand, certain allowances can be made. Perhaps then the most convincing argument for the theory is that on a day-to-day basis, Kantian Ethics provides a method for deciding the best, and most moral course of action. And perhaps this is the purpose of moral theory in the first place.

Some topics in this essay:
Categorical Imperative, Kantian Ethics, Todisco Phil, Kant God, morally permissible, Theory Ethics, kant’s theory, imperative process universalization, categorical imperative process, action morally permissible, hand wheel, save five, maxims universalized, categorical imperative, process universalization, imperative process, action morally, act manner,