Human Cloning : YES or NO
The cloning of human beings has been an issue that many people believe strongly in. The cloning of animals such as cows and sheep have already been successful, and many people think that the cloning of human beings is just the next step. This, however, has not gone over well with the government of the United States. Recently, a hearing has been underway to decide whether cloning should be legal in the United States. In fact, President George W. Bush has said that he will do everything possible to ban human cloning. The issue here should not be whether human cloning should be legal, because it should. The government should instead implement rules and regulations to regulate and police cloning research and development. Cloning is not a horrible science experiment, but a monumental scientific development. Many people look upon the idea of human cloning with fear and disdain. Many do not realize that the cloning of human beings could be beneficial to the human race. Many researchers involved in cloning experiments believe that cloning could offer a way for infertile couples and other couples a way to reproduce, when they otherwise could not. Cloning could offer the gift of life to those who might not be able to obt
Human cloning also offers a possibility that until very recently seemed very far-fetched. Cloning offers the possibility of allowing those who are dead, in a sense, be born again. In fact, many people believe that this may be the best way human cloning technology could be used. Families could bring back a dead family member or relative. This idea already appeals to many families who have invested money and time into this new possibility. One couple that lost their baby in a botched surgery has already donated $200,000 to the Clonaid company in order to clone their dead baby. This is not the only case; many families are saving the cells of their dead family members in hopes that one day that may be able to see them once again. Many question whether one has the right to kill living embryos, and that whether it would not amount to abortion. But, this argument is pointless because we do not actually destroy any embryos created by nature, when an experiment fails. In fact, the cells used are not embryos at all. They are stem cells taken from a person and cultured to grow into an entire human being. So, we do not kill embryos given by nature but just a single cell. This is not sinful considering the millions of cells that are killed (voluntarily) by trivial accidents of daily life, every day. The implications of cloning technology have sparked the debate. Many question the moral and ethical aspects of cloning. Many ask if it is ethical to bring a child in to this world to replace someone else. This the same question of whether it is right to have another baby after one has died. No one is say that the child'
Some topics in this essay:
George Bush,
York Times,
Institute Health,
,
human cloning,
United Recently,
Calif February,
cloning human,
cloning research,
Daniel Kevles,
Harold Varmus,
cloning technology,
Lyndon JP,
cloning research development,
cloning offer,
cloning legal,
cloning experiments,
replace else,
believe human,
believe human cloning,
human cloning technology,
cloning offers possibility,
science experiment,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1122
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Human Cloning : YES or NO Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|