DNA testing has many uses, both positive and negative, in our society. Genetic profiling has been beneficial in paternity suits and rape cases, where the father or the assailant could be identified. However, despite its growing number of utilizations, DNA profiling is extremely hazardous when results are inaccurate or used to discriminate.

Many have benefited from the genetic engineering that has developed at a frightening rate in the last decade. Evabeth T. wrote in the Family Forum expressing her gratefulness of DNA testing. “Had I not had the genetic testing, I would not have known of the tumor until symptoms occurred, and then I might have had major problems like a heart attack or a stroke,” (Ask the Family). Evabeth is not the only person DNA profiling has benefited. In 1989, Donald Roultodt a prominent father of three was convicted of sexual abuse with his seven-year-old daughter in the Georgia courts of law, (Thompson, 1989). Donald’s conviction, along with many other similar cases, was due to the DNA testing

Aside from its usefulness in many legal investigations, DNA profiling can be used in the workplace to discriminate against employees whose profiles could

“Ask the Family.” VHL Family Alliance Home Page 5:4 (December 1997): Online.

Some topics in this essay:
Fourth Amendment, Donald Roultodt, Andrew Grubb, Diagnostics Center, Profiling DNA, Family Forum, dna profiling, Home Page, Family Evabeth, Page Online, Publications Online, dna testing, genetic testing, dna profiling extremely, profiling law policy, constitutional rights, profiling extremely, testing aids, blood testing, dna diagnostics center, dna fingerprinting, aids dna profiling, aids dna, dna profiling law, law policy,