A Doll's House vs. The Visit
In A Doll’s House author Henrik Ibsen uses façade to portray his characters as being shallower than what they truly are; this allowed him to give the characters Nora and Krogstad depth toward the dénouement. As for Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s The Visit, he uses façade to give his play dramatic irony. Each play uses façade, but the ulterior motives of the characters differ between the two plays. In A Doll’s House, the characters conceal their motives for the better, while in The Visit, the townspeople conceal their motives for the worse. Ibsen and Dürrenmatt’s technique of façade also differ by the character type on which they choose to utilize it. In Ibsen’s play, he gives façades to specific characters, while in Dürrenmatt’s play, the façade is also used for a more generalized group. Upon examination of the plays, The Visit and A Doll’s House, one can note that each author uses a strategy of facade to add depth to the characters. Henrik Ibsen created a façade around two of his central characters that imposed ideas and emotions into the audience’s mind. These thoughts were the opposite of what they appeared to be in the conclusion of the play. The characters’ personalities were transformed in t
Dürrenmatt’s The Visit not only fashions a façade around the main characters, Ill and Claire, but around the entire population of the small town of Güllen as well. While the townspeople of Güllen appear to be decent people, they mask their genuine intent and, in some cases, their actual personalities. Take, for instance, the townspeople. Despite what the townspeople claim—that they would sooner endure poverty than shed the blood of a beloved town friend—they conceal their true intent: to take the life of Ill in order to rise out of their poverty. They are not actively verbal in this, of course. Instead, they express these motives through simple actions as opposed to words. The audience catches glimpses of this when the townspeople are shown to be charging more things “to account” and their sudden improvement in their manner of dress. Ill, though seemingly different, puts up the same type of façade. While he appears to be a good, wholesome citizen of the town, he is really covering up the sin that he had committed with Claire Zachanassian back in their teenage years. The turning point comes when Claire enters the play and reveals Ill for the philanderer he used to be. Even in the presence of the older Claire, he evades the consequences of fathering a bastard child by emphasizing, “It’s over and done with, dead and buried!” (pp 38). As for Claire, she puts up the false pretense of being a generous benefactor to Güllen, when her motives are quite evil: to kill the man who left her many years before. Even though her goal in the town is to kill a man, Dürrenmatt calls for the actor to play a humane and civil character toward the audience, creating a perverted sense of character depth where the audience views the murderer as the victim. The Visit takes advantage of the façade technique by not only creating false personalities for specific characters, but also generating a city in which people are not as they appear. Motives also played a key part in the use of façades. In Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, he takes advantage of façades to cause turmoil amongst the characters in the play. Krogstad is given two façades: one that presents him as a powerless, unimportant man in society to Torvald, and another that presents him as a relentless, manipulative beast to Nora. Toward the end of the pla
Some topics in this essay:
Doll’s House,
Claire Zachanassian,
Henrik Ibsen,
Ill Claire,
Dürrenmatt’s Visit,
Ill Ill,
Nora Ibsen,
Ibsen Visit’s,
Ibsen Dürrenmatt’s,
Nora Krogstad,
doll’s house,
main characters,
dürrenmatt’s visit,
versus woman,
audience discovers,
characters dürrenmatt’s play,
battle versus,
henrik ibsen,
citizen town,
technique façade,
battle versus woman,
play façade,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1579
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|