The U.S. government has already forgot their lesson by raising the drinking age from 18 to 21 in the mid-1980s. President Reagan & Congress had brought the prohibition back again, except on a smaller group of people. Nonetheless it was still a ban. I’ve heard many of times that if an 18-year old can vote & die for his country, then their throats should be able to feel the burn of whiskey. If they can throw a grenade, you should be able to throw back a shot of

There have been many signs that have favored changing the drinking age back to 18. If the U.S. had gone from the early 1900s through the mid-80s with the drinking age at 18, why change it? I do see how since 87’ the fatality rate had decreased, but that was for the group ages 16-20. I would like to see the decrease for 18-20; as I had said before, the number of drinkers between the ages of 18 & 20 has not changed since the ban has been placed. What’s the point of keeping the law?

tequila. These arguments are honest in their meanings but it goes deeper than that.

One of the main arguments used in favor of raising the drinking age during the 1980s was drunk driving. Groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) began to bring more and more public attention to drunk driving fatalities in the early part of the 1980s. On July 17, 1984, Reagan signed t

Some topics in this essay:
Reagan Congress, Administration NHSTA, Age Act, Prohibition American, Driving MADD, Amendment Constitution, University Michigan, drinking age, drinking age 18, drunk driving, age 18, raising drinking age, minimum drinking age, minimum drinking, 10 percent, lose 10, lose 10 percent, ban alcohol, raising drinking,