Mexican and Central American I
Many American’s who are not familiar with Mexican and Central American immigration may fall into the trap of thinking that there are no differences between the people, migrations, or the implications that these migrations have had on the economy in the United States. Absolutely, the United State’s industries and businesses are dependent upon the existing Mexican and Central American immigration labor force to take the lower echelon jobs, but the immigration process and the factors surrounding the immigration have many differences. Consequently, I argue that although Central American and Mexican immigrants are racialized as Latinos who take jobs away from American citizens, hold similar social status, and both use networks, the immigration by the people from Mexico since the 1960’s has many differences from that of the people of Central America. However, before going into detail about these two countries separately, it is necessary to discuss the similarities concerning immigrants from these Latin American countries. In the mid-1960’s the issue of Mexican or Latin American immigration virtually disappeared as an issue in national politics because of “intensifying civil rights movement, urban unrest, and the escalatio
A major difference between Mexican and Latin American immigration is the reason for the migration during the 1960’s. For the Central Americans there appear to be two underlying conditions that spurred the immigration. First, the economic turmoil in Central America was extremely adverse and there was a lot of economic uncertainty. Secondly, and which differs from the Mexican reason to migrate the most, is the rampant war that was going on, the violence, and the political turmoil that caused many Central Americans to immigrate. Lopez states, “emigration was stimulated by the horrors of civil war and governmental terror and repression. These immigrants are refugees…” The political violence in the region directly affected many people’s lives as their friends and family were killed and their own lives threatened. Before 1979 most of the immigration was due to economics, but post-1979 migrations were generated by these severe economic and political stresses faced by most of the nations in the Central American region. Consequently, Central Americans had little option but to stay and live with the aftermath or emigrate to the United Sates. Also, the types of jobs that Central Americans take are centered more towards service occupations while the Mexicans are centered more on farm labor. In conclusion, although Mexican and Central American migrants are racialized together, their migrating experiences are very different. This paper has shown the similarities and differences in the migration process between Mexicans and Central Americans. Furthermore, while the reasons for migrating were different for Mexicans and Central Americans the goal for both was to seek more opportunity in the United States. First, in the Mexican case, there are social networks on both sides of the border that assist the migration to the United States. With the use of these social networks, immigrants assist their relatives, friends, and neighb
Some topics in this essay:
Central Americans,
Americans Mexicans,
Central American,
Latin American,
Central America,
Bracero Program,
American Mexican,
Opportunity Mexican,
United Sates,
central american,
Vietnam Gutierrez,
central americans,
latin american,
central america,
social networks,
mexican central american,
mexican central,
american immigration,
central american immigrants,
mexicans central,
mexican immigrants,
migration process,
mexicans central americans,
mexican latin american,
lopez et al,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1316
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Mexican and Central American I Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|