Many people believe the television violence shown on several programs influences children to become involved in self-destructive activities. They are convinced that the brutal viol

Whether media violence is approved of or not, it is here to stay. It is a part of life to which many must adapt. What today’s adolescent must realize is violence is controllable, and violence is never the solution to any problem. Parents are not teaching their children morals and values, which in turn lead these children to committing violent acts. Those that oppose of television violence say it molds these children into adolescent murderers. To blame the media for the violence that is taking place around the world is simply an easy answer for the public’s dying need to know why. Failing to teach children right from wrong is the fundamental reason for the spread of juvenile violence, not to myth of television violence (Hinds 225).

ence found in the media leads young, influential minds to engage in various crimes such as gang fights, school shootings, and suicides. In order to fix the problem, many Americans people the government should regulate the violence shown on television programs. These concerned men and women are convinced that the central problem of television violence is found in the heavy viewing of violent entertainment by today’s adolescent, the violent content engrossed in entertainment industry, and the psychological and behavioral effects of combining these two elements (Hepburn 244).

Last of all, much of the public who disapprove of television violence believe many psychological and behavioral problems occur with children who are overly exposed to violence. They believe children will be disrespectful toward others, especially their parents. These concerned men and women stipulate that children become less sensitive to the pain and suffering of others because they see it as an everyday occurrence on television. Those who criticize television violence are convinced that children may become more fearful of the world around them and think violence is more common than in reality. Several people who reject television violence are certain that children may also be more likely to behave in aggressive or harmful ways toward others due to the violence seen on television. Children begin to imitate what they see on certain shows for example, a 13-year-old child lit himself on fire after he saw a stunt-man do it on MTV’s “Jackass” (Gogna n.pag.). Furthermore, television violence protesters believe children who are overly exposed to television violence find aggression and brutality as an acceptable way to achieve goals and solve problems (Edgar 34). As a result of the psychological and behavioral effects of television violence shown in children’s programming, several communities who oppose of television violence believe this to be the third of three interlinking elements that lead children to self-destructive lives.

Several ideas and solutions for fixing the television vio

Some topics in this essay:
Social Education, Policy UCLA, Eric Harris, Coleman Hinds, Intelligence Agency, Bill Watt, Psychological Association, James Coleman, television violence, Paul Simon, Canada United, hepburn 244, hinds 225, violence shown, violence believe, television violence believe, violent content, violent programming, television violence shown, television programs, shown programs, interlinking elements lead, violence convinced, school shootings suicides, violence shown programs,