Liberalisim to Socialism

Early theories of the Enlightment philosophy formed an underlying theme through the history of liberalism and the development of socialism. However often contradicted through our own human err of bias perception, the works of great thinkers such as Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Locke have provided a pivotal influence on societal values. This philosophy is the groundwork for what we now more wholly understand as laws of nature, in whatever form, not to be exploited or undermined. The reality of contemporary liberalism, as it is inspired by socialism, clearly fuses with the definition of this philosophical genius, if indeed it could be summarized as a general ideology. Early Enlightment philosophy provided the guiding light to the liberalistic evolution of freedom from restriction, to freedom in the sense of opportunity as a socialistic ideology.

Philosophers were the first to realize what the aristocratic society, the bourgeois, and the bourgeoisie failed to understand. For far too long had European citizens consecutively endured the rule and abuse of absolute monarchs. No soul dared to threaten the authority of king or church as those who did might be tortured or burn

In conclusion, the early state of liberal values drove the concepts of socialism, and inevitably resulted in an integrated government that included socialism as an extension of its liberal parent in the ultimate quest for equality and freedom. Regardless of how strong an economic theory may appear to stand on its own, citizens are not born indoctrinated with such theoretical essence. The fierce imbalance of powers motivated to achieve one such society continued the liberalism’s evolution into an ideological force complex enough to suit the natural intricacy of society. Social hierarchy continued to be a trend long after dissolution of monarch authority. It was not until every dogma was defeated that equality was realized as the one essential to our “noble savage” which society had been fighting for all along. Tocqueville spoke of this internal need: “democratic peoples have a natural taste for liberty…but their passion for equality is ardent, insatiable, eternal, and invincible. They want equality in freedom…they will put up with poverty, servitude, and barbarism, but they will not endure aristocracy”. Liberalism and socialism are two ideologies of complete difference that proved to satisfy each other in every respect, and intrinsic minds of the early thinkers inspired the values rooted in this development. Early Enlightment philosophy provided the guiding light to the liberalistic evolution of freedom from restriction, to freedom in the sense of opportunity as a socialistic ideology.

Although few people took Marx and Engles seriously in the mid nineteenth century, their successful organizational skills helped bring into existence a coalition of socialist parties dedicated to working proletariat, the International Workingmen’s Association. Marx was not a reformer, and his belief that capitalism could never be tolerable for the working class contrasted with the people’s actual interest in staking their claim in the system, rather than overthrowing it. There was the common perception that there could be no mixed system which could give the state enough power to assure economic and social security, but while not being enough to breed tyranny. The assumption that there were two absolute distinct social orders, capitalism and socialism was the belief that essence or theory was more correct than reality. Further more, many fell victim to the idea that if liberalism and socialism were two entirely separate ideologies, than they must be kept apart to remain concrete or “real”, although in reality their isolated essence could never truly live up to its theory. The government led by Franklin D. Roosevelt defied this single-minded ideological convention, with many of his successful cross-method solutions. The New Deal presented a “middle way” between the rigid conservatism and totalitarian elucidation that drove Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia. Roosevelt believed that the diversity of a more humanized democracy would strengthen the balance for its freedom: “This country is big enough to experiment with several diverse systems and follow several different lines…why must we put our economic policy in a single systematic strait jacket”. During the 1932 campaign, Roosevelt, in great obstruction to Marxist anti-reform, described the current state of democracy and liberal policy: “Say that civilization is a tree which, as it grows, continually produces rot and dead wood. The radical says: ‘Cut it down’. The conservative says ‘Don’t touch it’. The liberal compromises: ‘Let’s prune, so that we loose neither the old trunk nor the new branches’”. This philosophical compromise realized that the sacrifices of individual freedom made to the collective moral body operated utterly upon the respect and assistance of furthering whatever efforts the people claimed in favor of.

As a father is to his children, legitimate rule undermined a new relationship between sovereigns to their subjects. Th

Some topics in this essay:
John Locke, Thomas Jefferson’s, Common Sense, Industrial Revolution, North American, Communist Manifesto, Montesquieu Locke, Russia Roosevelt, Monroe Doctrine, Age Enlightment, nineteenth century, industrial revolution, freedom sense, enlightment philosophy, legitimate rule, socialistic ideology, provided guiding light, enlightment philosophy provided, provided guiding, philosophy provided, light liberalistic, guiding light, light liberalistic evolution, guiding light liberalistic, liberalistic evolution freedom,