Managers and Leaders in Organizations
The words manager and leader are often used interchangeably, but have very different meanings. Webster’s dictionary describes a manager as a person controlling the movement or behavior of others, or one who has charge of others, and directs their affairs. In contrast, Webster’s definition of a leader is a person that directs through influence by going along with or before, others that would follow (Guralnik, 1984). In fact, the wording in the assignment of this paper has connotations towards the differences between a manager and a leader. The assignment asks us to address the “role of a manager”, as opposed to the “characteristics of a leader.” The phrase “role of a manager” connotes a task-oriented, strictly defined, robotic functioning by a mindless drone that plays his part as outlined in a script. Whereas the phrase “characteristics of a leader”, evokes thoughts of abstract personal qualities to be employed by an empowered individual towards a common goal. This paper will compare and contrast the distinct differences between managing and leading. Additionally, it will focus on the concept of emotionally intelligent leadership. Finally, it will address the question of whether a manager must always be a leade
Emotional intelligence is a combination of competencies. These skills contribute to a person’s ability to manage and monitor his or her own emotions, to correctly gauge the emotional state of others and to influence opinions (Goleman, 1998). Goleman describes a model of five dimensions. Each area has its own set of behavioral attributes as follows. Has a short-range view Has a long-range perspective 4. Empathy is the understanding of others by being aware of their needs, perspectives, feelings, concerns, sensing the developmental needs of others. In this paper, and to a large extent throughout the popular business culture, the role of a manager has been negatively portrayed as an insular person who resists change and has very little leadership to offer. Quy Nguyen Huy however, would not be so quick to dismiss the contributions of the stereotypical middle manager in particular. It is argued here, and supported by Huy in his (2001) Harvard Business Review published article “In praise of middle managers”, that managers must not always be leaders. Huy contends that very often middle managers are in fact leaders. However, even when acting within the manager role as it has been defined in this paper, Huy maintains that middle managers often make valuable contributions to their companies, particularly during periods of radical change. Leaders and managers also have much different conceptions of work itself. Leaders develop new approaches to long-standing problems. Leaders work in high-risk positions because of a strong aversion to mundane work. Conversely, managers view work as an enabling process. Managers tolerate practical, mundane work because of a strong survival instinct that makes them risk-averse. They are good at reaching compromises and mediating conflicts between opposing perspectives, but lack the influence to avoid future conflicts (Goleman, 1998).
Some topics in this essay:
Scott Cook,
Ingersoll-Rand Company,
Business Review,
Century Drucker,
Originates Accepts,
,
Goleman Covey,
According Covey,
Develops Focuses,
emotional intelligence,
Nguyen Huy,
manager leader,
goleman 1998,
managers leaders,
huy 2001,
middle managers,
leaders managers,
sense self,
aspects emotional intelligence,
leaders huy,
distinct differences,
differences manager leader,
development process focuses,
manager plays role,
leader’s ability effective,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2716
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Managers and Leaders in Organizations Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|