Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Power of Surveillance in our S

Power of Surveillance in our Society

In Michel Foucault¡¦s essay, ¡§Panopticism¡¨, he makes the argument that we are all living in a society of surveillance where discipline is being effectively achieved through the power of surveillance. The power of surveillance, as described by Foucault, is ¡§visible and unverifiable¡¨ (312), and is the basis for forming discipline in society because it draws the individual to believe that the world he lives in is one that is continually watching over him. Constant surveillance brings about anxiety resulting in discipline in the individual. According to Foucault, the power and effectiveness of this model of surveillance in achieving discipline makes the use physical force as in the traditional model of prisons in the past no longer necessary. He uses Bentham¡¦s Panopticon to illustrate the power of surveillance.

The Panopticon is a marvelous machine which, whatever use one may wish to put it to, produces homogeneous effects of power ¡K It is not necessary to use force to constrain the convict to good behaviour, the madman to calm, the worker to work, the schoolboy to application, the patient to the observation of the regulations. (313)


What was mentioned was not an isolated example of the limitations of the panoptic model in our society. People are no longer fearful of the power of surveillance because people have found ways of escaping surveillance in order to be disciplined. Foucault talked about Bentham¡¦s dream, of

Bentham¡¦s dream is just an ideal that can never be achieved in our society due to the fact that we cannot generate a society where surveillance can always be put into effect. The power of surveillance and productivity, as brought forward by Foucault, are thus limited in maintaining order and benefiting our society. The internet is an example of how surveillance loses its power in discipline because it is a lot more difficult for it to operate in such an environment. The internet resembles the Panopticon because people are being constantly surveilled by others who are also on the internet, without knowing who is observing them or when they are being observed. However, although people on the internet are constantly being surveilled, their identity can be easily disguised by a different name, email or location. People are therefore not fearful of the surveillance present on the internet anymore because they can easily get away with crime by their disguise. Perhaps this is able to explain why people choose to commit crimes through the internet. Spreading of viruses, hacking of computers, selling of pirated discs on the internet are all examples of crime on the internet due to the limitation of the panoptic model. It failed its purpose as a disciplinary mechanism and as a productive agent on the internet because of the system of the internet that caused it to fail to impose a psychological effect of fear in us to discipline ourselves. Bentham¡¦s dream will remain a dream, for it may not be possible for the panoptic model to work effectively and productively in all situations and environment, such as the example of the internet mentioned above.

Before we can further discuss on the limitations of surveillance in discipline we have to understand how surveillance work under the Panoptic model. Panopticism, as put forward by Foucault, is a principle based on the Panopticon, a prison designed by an English reformer and philosopher named Bentham. The Panopticon consists of a central tower encircled by a ring of cells. A window is present in each cell that lets light in from the outside, creating backlighting to the inmates in the cells. In other words, the Panopticon is designed in a way to ensure no prisoners can see the guard in the central tower, while the guard is able to observe every

Some topics in this essay:
Bentham Panopticon, Bentham¡¦s Panopticon, Michel Foucault¡¦s, panoptic model, According Foucault, power surveillance, speed cameras, speed limit, speed limit sign, possibility surveillance, described foucault, psychological effect, limit sign, central tower, discipline society, sign panoptic model, speed cameras speed, limitations panoptic model, cameras speed cameras,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1755
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Power of Surveillance in our S


Professional Papers:
The ConversationCoppola1711 words
AIDS Discourse2501 words
J. Edgar Hoover The name J. Edgar Hoover is almost synonymous wi1797 words
Air Cargo Management2897 words
The Career of Paul Robeson4152 words
Organized Crime5845 words



Student Written Papers:
The Power Of Surveillance1321 words
Panopticism1229 words
Technological Surveillance1306 words
1984 vs our world today1686 words
Surveillance1073 words

Look at even more essays on Power of Surveillance in our S
More English Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers