The prime article clearly illustrates a major default in our current legal system in dealing with criminal offenders and the issuing of bail prior to sentencing.

This is one of but many incidents where criminal offenders have been allowed bail, and during this period have re-offended, assaulted, and even murdered victims.

The grant or non-grant of bail raises a num

However, with our current legal system, the criminal past of an offender is not to be used in a “case” against an accused, as it may impact on the outcome of a case. So then, what security do victims of such criminals have prior to sentencing or court procedures?

According to Part 2, Division 3, of The Bail Act (NSW) 1978:

Public outcry over this carelessness in our legal system has demanded changes to ensure security and safety of such victims. Possible solutions put forth include (as outlined in the supplementary article added):

• A new focus on offenders with a violent background, with those charged with “serious offences” almost certain to be refused bail

Some topics in this essay:
Bail Law, Act NSW, Adam Speyer, Anthony Bardakos, Van Koeverden, , Ms Koeverden, Bail Act, accused person, Daily Telegraph, legal system, Law” Bill, bail act, granting bail, history violence, bail act nsw, van koeverden, prior sentencing, bail prior, trish van, accused offenders, act nsw 1978, current legal system, legal system dealing, person history violence,