Bransford's three ideas about text comprehension.

The first of these ideas was that the mental representation of a text does not correspond to any of its linguistic representation. We use syntactic and compositional semantic rules to work out the meaning of the phrases and clauses of a text. We do not typically retain detalled syntactic or semantic representation of what we hear or read. In most cases , detalled

At encoding, explicit case fillers have to be checked to see if they can be omitted which is only possible if they can be rescontructed.

There is another way of inference in omission theory. It is considered that elaborative case filling inferences and in particular the finding that highly probable explicit case fillers are confused in memory with implicit case fillers. The standards account of this finding is that an implicit case filler, such as " a knife" in:

An inference could be made in several stages . it was showed that bottles was better than basket for recalling:

Some topics in this essay:
CONTINUITY Mental, ABSTRACT SITUATIONS, SUMMARY Bransford's, INFERENCE STAGES, MENTAL MODELS, KNOWLEDGE UNDERLYING, MAIN IDEA, MODELS PERSPECTIVE, INFERENCES Bransford, THEORY Theory, mental models, mental models theory, models theory, mental representation, information clauses, current clause, background knowledge, referential continuity, text representation, phrases clauses, content text, representation content text, mental representation content, information explicit text, meaning phrases clauses,