Diversity Aand Education
There is a misrepresentation of what diversity means and its implication on the Public Education in the United States. United States public schools have become a battleground for contending educational and social philosophies. Some school rejects the emerging multicultural curriculum while others argues for greater recognition of the diverse cultures that are increasingly represented in our rapidly expanding population; specially Hispanics. Despite the facts that some public schools served all students (not students let behind Act), Mexican American children during the first four decades of the twenty-century was limited to elementary grades. I believe we still have discrimination in public schools, maybe not to extend like were in the old times, but now we called it different: “ Multiculturalism”. Most of the school board members now and then; still unsympathetic to diversity. We have seen it in the Lone Star movie, which is a rich and rewarding exploration of the tensions and attractions between the people of this multi-racial community. The screenplay avoids platitudes and easy answers, and treats the characters as individuals, rather than symbols or idealized stereotypes. Various political, racial, and familial tensio
Finally, we come to Learning Capitalist Culture Deep in the Heart of Tejas. Foley’s discussion is by far the most complicated of the three, in two ways: 1) his brings in much more social theory, and 2) the situation that he writes about is quite complex. He is trying to associate capitalism, culture, ethnicity, and social class in a modern community. There are several different varieties of political economy theory, but they all share two assumptions about society: First, they assume that the economy—the way that people use resources to make a living—is the main source of social process. Other aspects of culture and social relations are connected to the economy in direct and indirect ways and may influence the development of the economy; but the economy is the main engine of history. So, we can say that in this view, the economy is a “theoretically privileged” institution—it is more important than other institutions—because it shapes them more than they shape it. Second, it is assumed that there is no empirical separation between political and economic phenomena—power always has an economic base and the economy always is orchestrated by those who hold power. For example, the notion of a “free market,” an economic system that operates by its own principles without political interference, is considered to be a mythical condition that never has existed. This is a story of the Great Possibility, what America COULD be, and what it has lost by not working past its prejudices and fears. Lone Star is most intimately concerned with how different cultures and generations mix, match, and interact in a place where anglos have the wealth and power. The black community, populated mainly by soldiers from the fort, is a small-but-important force. Sayles explores the bipolar issues of racial divisiveness and tolerance, both as they exist today and as they were nearly forty years ago. But at the end of Lone Star, we are left with an image of hope. A Different Mirror is just that a way for the majority culture to see itself. Without placing blame or guilt; Takaki discusses, the Mexican American group whose role in history have deeply affected the American experience. This is not to deny the validity of the experiences of this ethnic group. Taking members of the majority culture uncomfortable is part of what makes; A different mirror effective. We need to be honest about our past so that we can ensure that our future as a multiethnic society makes it possible for all groups to be acknowledged and to contribute to the whole of who America. I recall a part in the Lone Star movie in which the owner of the restaurant refuse to recognized her past (she came to United Stated, by crossing the river like many Mexican, and also she tries constantly to enforced the English) She was upset to her own people calling them wet back and making remarks about them been the same. She likes many Hispanic as soon they become part of the United State system wants to forget their roots, or don’t want their kids to be proud of where they come form. Now, it is not surprising that Marx’ thought has had an enormous influence in the social sciences, because—in addition to his critique of capitalism—he also happened to produce one of the two most systematic attempts to create a general theory of society (the other attempt was by American sociologist Talcott Parsons and his students). One may not like what Marx had to say, but there are few important aspects of social life that he did not consider and try to explain. Marx believed that the process of economic production was fundamental to social life, for three reasons: 1) it is in the process of production that humans come to grips with their environments (extracting resources); 2) the production process forces humans to create extensive social relationships of cooperation; and 3) all value is created in the process of production. He reasoned that nothing had value u
Some topics in this essay:
Talcott Parsons,
History Marx,
Tejas Foley’s,
Lone Star,
Mexican American,
Marx Marx,
Citizens LULAC,
North Town,
United Stated,
United United,
social class,
social classes,
mode production,
mexican american,
lone star,
public schools,
means production,
political economy,
marx believed,
school board,
social class divisions,
lone star movie,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2799
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
|