The ability to strike an individual with emotion is the ability to detect that debile section of the human and touch the true depths of their natural sentiments. King utilizes emotion in a tremendous way by quoting the Bible and mentioning Christ’s doings. He takes in consideration that the components of his audience are clergymen that assumingly have a profound study of the Bible and intends to persuade them with this knowledge tactically. When he incorporates passages of the Bible, he compares them to actions he has or will act upon in good faith: “Like Paul, I must constantly respond to the Macedonian call for aid”. Here King c

ompares his predicating of freedom with that of the Apostle Paul’s of the gospel. King later uses a different form of emotional appeal when he speaks of his personal encounters with racism, quoting his five year old son with an ingenuous question: “Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?”. With statements such as these, King places the reader in a small area of his life, stating events he has lived and sensed, enabling the piece to penetrate further within its lectors.

Morals, beliefs, and values are learned qualities humans possess, and serve as the catalysts of the conscience. Humans act upon accordingly to what the conscience dictates, idealistically speaking, and the conscience acts upon that individual’s perception of right and wrong. King combines this effectively and wisely inserts it in the piece, thus appealing to his selected audience in the ethical aspect: “One who breaks the unjust law must do so openly, lovingly and with a willingness to accept the penalty”. Here King approaches his audience in a humble manner stating that one should hold himself responsible for his actions, leading the audience onto sensing the conspicuous honesty in his words, provoki

Some topics in this essay:
God God’s”, Birmingham Jail”, Apostle Paul’s, David Thoreau, King Jr, emotional appeal, audience humble, , thoreau lacks,