Although the two differ in opinion on the process of profiling for anti-terrorism efforts, both Profiling and Safety use similar methods to convey their message. When thinking in terms of the article’s ethos, each writer is able to establish an intrinsic credibility with the audience. This credibility is derived from solid argumentation and a certain higher level connection with the audience which is difficult to explain. It is as if in each piece the reader comes to trust the information being presented to them because the writers truly feel the same as their words imply. In each of these essays, the author often uses a first person tone, using words such as I and we, a method of pathos. In Profiling, Krauthammer is quick to point out that he is indeed a member of the target audience citing as such, “We do it privately. We do it quietly. But we do it”. By placing himself in situations that his audience, the general populous, feels themselves, this first person persona aids his credibility factor amongst readers. Likewise Safety takes a first person approach to better connect through passages of “I suspect that many more Americans…” which connects herself to fellow Americans. The similarities within the pathos of these two passages continue with a common emotional ploy to grab the reader’s minds if not for at least a sentence. Both Krauthammer and Kaminer refer to the attacks of September 11th to gain attention and further explain their reasoning. Evoking the dread and sorrow surrounding the events of this horrible day pull the reader together with the author in the sense that each has felt the common pain of terrorism. Perhaps the most common of the rhetorical appeals between these two essays is the logos element. Each author effectively uses fact and definition to convince the audience to agree with their respective opinion. With the main idea of Profiling being the identification of the average terrorist, it would clearly seem relevant for Krauthammer to define his description of this character. He does so when he states, “They [terrorists] were al-Qaeda: young, Islamic, Arab and male”. Although many may assume his point is merely a racial prejudice of how he feels alone, he goes on to state, “That is not a stereotype. That is a fact”. His system of profiling and deduction aims at improving the odds of capturing a future terrorist, something he feels we fail to do today because “we are spending 90% of our time scrutinizing people everyone knows are no threat.” Where Profiling uses logic and reasoning to fight for profiling, Safety accesses logos to derail the wrongdoings of lawmakers. In one particular paragraph,

Some topics in this essay:
Prospect Kaminer, Islamic Arab, Krauthammer Kaminer, Profiling Krauthammer, Wallstreet Journal, , Profiling Safety, Likewise Safety, Newsweek Newsweek, Jesse Jackson, krauthammer kaminer, anti-terrorism efforts, pathos logos, ethos pathos logos, ethos pathos, audience krauthammer kaminer, writing rhetoric, idea profiling, differences writing, audience krauthammer, extrinsic ethos, serious tone, differences writing rhetoric,