Ethical Relativism This theory believes that morality is comparative to the norms of a person’s culture or that an action is right or wrong depending on one’s society to which they belong. This theory supports a belief there are no universal moral standards that can be applied to people from different societies at all times. To resolve disputes or reach ethical agreements can be judge only by the society’s own standards (www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/ethicalrelativism).

Because they claim the underlying principles from one society to another do not differ even if their moral practices do differ, most reject the ethical relativism theory. For example, how one cares for their

Written and Unwritten Codes of Ethics

Have you defined the problem accurately?

Can you engage the affected parties in a discussion of the problem before you make your decision?

Decision-making, where the person considers the implications of the decision before acting, is moral reasoning. A common dilemma is being too absolute, where the same rule applies regardless of the consequences or being too relativistic where the circumstances determines the solution (Hartman, L. 2002 pg. 68). One model to consider when making decisions is the stakeholder theory. This theory asks the following:

Who was involved in the situation in the first place?

Some topics in this essay:
Ethical Relativism, Codes Ethics, Laura Nash, Thinking Decision-making, Contrast Ethics, Ethical Egoism, Ethical Egoists, , Ethical System, Conclusion Ethics, hartman 2002, 2002 pg, ethical relativism, hartman 2002 pg, 26 2003, ethical egoism, retrieved 26 2003, practices beliefs, retrieved 26, unwritten codes ethics, pg 4, unwritten codes, codes ethics, 2002 pg 4, moral practices beliefs,