In my discussion of the above statement I will first of all examine the basic concept of the “public sphere” as understood by Jurgen Habermas. Then I will point out a few of the discrepancies between his ideal and the practice of the “old public sphere”. Finally I will attempt to show to what extent the Internet may or may not be closer to the ideals outlined by Habermas. I have felt that in the course of this scrutiny it would be appropriate to rely almost exclusively on sources available from the Internet (as well as my lecture notes).
Habermas sees the public sphere as the essential vehicle for the furtherment of democracy. In his approach he combines the liberal view of democracy (i.e. to keep the state in check) and the participatory view that has been laid out by many philosophers and philosophies, from the driving ideals of the Greek polis, to Jean Jacques Rousseau and even Alasdair MacIntyre. The public sphere is a realm where a consensus-building discussion occurs among the participants, who „overcome their at first subjectively biased views in favor of a rationally motivated agreement” (Habermas, quoted by Bass).
"The bourgeois public sphere may be conceived above all as the sphere of private people com
Example Essays Home
