Reviewing the article numerous times, I was positioned between aggravation and disappointment; it is unfathomable that the author of this commentary could actually be convinced by his support of these ludicrousl

y weak and undeveloped arguments that gay marriage could easily jeopardize all of society. Furthermore, I felt insulted for the men whom this article was initially and audaciously directed to because, judging by the logic behind the piece, a real man would seem to be synonymous with an ignorant and idiotic man. The sagacity that evades Charalambous’ commentary ignites my fierce opposition of his social position on the issue of gay marriage.

There are not enough persuasive arguments in Mark Charalambous’ commentary to convince one that gay marriage is indeed a threat to society. As being undoubtedly equal as human beings to heterosexual people, gay people are also relatively equally capable of having children, while raising and nurturing them. It is unfeasible to imagine that there should be such a mass effort to prohibit same-sex partners from fully committing themselves to each other through a bond that heterosexuals may comparatively take for granted. To express their union through the bond of marriage is a privilege they deserve to have because being homosexual is not synonymous with being incompetent, callous, and unequal; being gay, straight, female, or male is synonymous with being human.

Some topics in this essay:
Judicial Court’s, Psychological Association, Mark Charalambous’, United States’, Boston Herald, Gay Marriage”, Real Men”, gay marriage, Judicial Court, , arguments gay, alternative marriage, charalambous’ commentary, gay straight, Supreme Judicial, arguments gay marriage, gay parents, gay people, children raised, mark charalambous’, sexual reproduction, mark charalambous’ commentary, alternative marriage biological,