New Labour
New Labour’s sweeping victory in the 1997 elections rocked the British political landscape. The party’s landslide triumph decimated the Conservative party, decisively changing our understanding of Britain’s electorate and contemporary political ideology. New Labour’s phenomenal success can be largely attributed to its centrist stance, taking up issues that appealed to a broad constituency. Simultaneously exploiting the weaknesses of the Conservatives and pushing a difficult to contest “modernization” agenda, Blair transformed New Labour into a “catch-all party”. Blair’s “third-way” alternative created widespread cross-class appeal for New Labour, effectively capitalizing on an electorate searching for an alternative to the Conservative’s political malaise. It is important to first define the characteristics of the catch-all party before attempting to establish New Labour as one. According to Kirchheimer, becoming a catch-all party requires a “drastic reduction of the party’s ideological baggage, further strengthening of top leadership groups [who will be judged based on efficiency rather than identification with party goals], de-emphasis on social-class or denominational clientele, and securing access
to a variety of interest groups (1966: 58-59)”. After New Labour’s defeat in 1992, Blair worked incessantly to transform his party’s image and broaden its appeal across class lines. In doing so, he molded New Labour to meet the criteria that characterize the catch-all party. While New Labour’s flexible national doctrine was important in creating “a convenient rallying point (Kirchheimer 55)” for many of Britain’s voters, the importance of Blair’s portrayal of his party as competent and efficient in governance was crucial to its success. This satisfies Kirchheimer’s criteria that catch-all party leaders must strengthen themselves by emphasizing their governing efficiency over their commitment to party goals and ideals. Blair’s rhetoric of reform and modernization was particularly effective in portraying New Labour as a party dedicated to running a government marked by innovation and competence in delivering the people of Britain their needs (Krieger 227). Defining Britain’s national identity has been as issue close to the heart of New Labour. No longer are class and occupational interests the most decisive force. Blair has worked tirelessly to take advantage of this unprecedented opportunity to forge a new, cohesive British unity, highlighting the ideal of “one nation, one Britain (Blair 1998)”. Recognizing Britain’s role in the global community and its European roots, New Labour’s spokesmen have made great efforts to emphasize the country’s individualism, but at the same time balancing it with ideals of social justice and an embracement of it’s multicultural character (Parekh 2000: 12). Blair emphasizes the necessity of an inclusive modernization, in tackling the “scourge of social exclusion (Blair 1998)” by providing for those ignored by previous regimes, and to expand Britain’s global role. This is a significant departure from the Conservative leadership of Thatcher and Major, w
Some topics in this essay:
Wright Gamble,
NHS Labour,
Thatcher Major,
,
According Kirchheimer,
Task Force,
Recognizing Britain’s,
According Inglehart,
Labour Party,
National Assembly,
catch-all party,
labour party,
trade unions,
1997 election,
labour’s triumph catch-all,
britain’s electorate,
party attachments,
labour’s triumph,
triumph catch-all,
krieger 177,
triumph catch-all party,
labour catch-all party,
british electorate,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1307
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on New Labour Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|