Trial of Socrates
Socrates lived in Athens, the city known for it’s democratic methods and ways. Soon after Athens “fall”, Socrates is charged with blasphemy and corrupting the youth. Why is it that in a place where democracy is rooted from and exists in, that a teacher is charged for expressing his thoughts and ideas to others? However instead of freedom of expression, what Socrates has done, is labelled as crimes such as blasphemy and corrupting the youth. The Athenians were wrong for charging Socrates with both crimes of corrupting the youth, and blasphemy and executing him for them. Through his conviction we can also see the flaws of the democracy of Athens and how democracy has failed Socrates. The Trial of Socrates also helps in the further understanding of why Socrates did not believe in the democratic system of government. Socrates was charged with blasphemy for worshipping strange gods. Blasphemy is “ in religion, words or actions that display irreverence toward or contempt for God or that which is held sacred. Blasphemy is regarded as an offence against the community to varying degrees, depending on the extent of the identification of a religion with the society at large or the government.” (All ref
Socrates merely conversed with the youth. It is up to them to accept the ideas of Socrates and therefore he should not be punished for them. He was thought to have encouraged youthful followers to be anti-democratic and “indoctrinated them with his own contempt for democracy”. (Winspear and Silverberg) Socrates believed that not all individuals should be equal because most of the society lacked knowledge and that only those who are wise should rule all of Athens. Indeed he taught his students to challenge the norms. However, the charge of corrupting the youth in my opinion was wrong. Socrates “students” are not his full responsibility. The dictatorship led by Alcibiades and Critias should not place blame on Socrates but much rather on the individuals themselves. This is because they were acting on there own free will. They followed Socrates because they believed there was truth in his teachings, and therefore made the conscious choice to support dictatorship. Also, this charge of corrupting the youth should not be in question because of the general amnesty issued in 403, meaning Socrates should have acquitted all actions taken by the uprising. (Linder) It is one thing to teach ideas and another to force them upon a person. Socrates was a teacher and expressed his ideas. Not once had he pushed his students to agree with his teachings. Therefore Socrates should not bare responsibility
Some topics in this essay:
Cook Socrates,
Trial Socrates,
Alcibiades Critias,
Soon Athens,
Athens Indeed,
Silverberg Socrates,
Socrates Socrates,
corrupting youth,
blasphemy corrupting youth,
blasphemy corrupting,
trial socrates,
death socrates,
sentenced death,
sentenced death socrates,
exercised freedom speech,
socrates charged blasphemy,
majority rule,
athens democracy,
charged blasphemy,
charge corrupting,
charge corrupting youth,
socrates believed,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 944
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Trial of Socrates Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|