Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

comparing aristotle and kant

1. Aristotle and Kant, in the Nicomachean Ethics and Lectures on Ethics, both have different views on the positive and negative forms of self-love. This difference is clearly distinguished from the start. Aristotle uses the word self-love, also known as philautia, in a positive form, while Kant uses it in a negative form. Each philosopher also made their separate case that self-love plays an essential role in friendship.

To begin with, Aristotle used the word of self-love as being a friend to one’s self. He gave a positive and negative argument for self-love. On the positive end, Aristotle says that people with self-love are ruled by their highest part of the soul, which includes their mind, and their logos. Self-loved people are most concerned with nourishing their psyche or rational part of themselves. He is a good man that concerns himself for the sake of others. This person also strives and wishes for what are the noblest and the best and “gratifies the most authoritative element in himself and in all things obeys this” (Aristotle 236). He does so by using his reason, which allows him to recognize and distinguish what is good. They obviously aren’t selfish at all and don’t seem to seek


In closing, Aristotle and Kant had differences and similarities in their ideas of friendship. Aristotle gave us four characteristics of his idea of being a true friend. He said that a true friend wishes and does what is good for the sake of the friend. He also wishes and does well for the friend’s existence. A true friend enjoys spending time with his friend and shares things like his pleasures, emotional triumphs and losses and even their pains. For both philosophers the ideal of friendship is based on reciprocity. With reciprocity there is an equal exchange with the love of the self and the love of others without a loss. Like Aristotle, Kant believed that ideal friendship is not learned through experience, but through one’s reason. He said that the ultimate ideal of friendship is complete sacrifice for each other. Kant said in his book, “When, therefore, Socrates remarks, ‘My dear friends, there are no friends’...he is right; for any such absolute conformity is impossible; but the Idea is true” (Kant 202).

Some topics in this essay:
Aristotle Kant, Lectures Ethics, Kant Moral, Moreover Kant, According Kant, aristotle kant, true friend, ideal friendship, type friendship, according kant, love self, love friend, aristotle word self-love, loss aristotle kant, aristotle describes, common people, sake self, essential role friendship, love self love,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1551
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on comparing aristotle and kant


Professional Papers:
Kant and Practical Reason1698 words
Concepts of Societal Development5070 words
HUMAN RIGHTS AS UNIVERSAL RIGHTS5106 words



Student Written Papers:
Ethics Theory and Applications1797 words
Ethics Theory and Applications of Critical Thinking1849 words

Look at even more essays on comparing aristotle and kant
More English Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers