Cloning
On February 22, 1996, Ian Wilmut brought cloning of animals to our attention, when the first animal was successfully cloned, on that history-making day the cloned sheep named Dolly was born. Wilmut took a cell from the udder of a six-year -old ewe and sparked a jolt of electricity to fuse it to the egg of another sheep, which was then implanted into a third female. The only questionable aspect of the experiment was if the cloned cell was an adult cell or the offspring that the ewe was carrying at the time. Three reports in the July 23 issue of the journal Nature now lay those doubts to rest; Dolly is descended directly from a mature cell from the donor sheep. Soon after, Ryuzo Yanagimachi, a student at the University of Hawaii, further proved that adult cells could be cloned. He performed an experiment that produced twenty-two cloned mice. In one run, Yanangimachi used the natural color coding of mice for extra proof, taking cumulus cells from coffee-colored animals, ovaries from the black ones and using a white albino mouse as surrogate mother. As expected, the clones were coffee-colored. Despite the great technological discovery, cloning is causing great controversy because the more we learn about cloning, the closer we
While researching the topic of human cloning, I found many opinionated essays that people had written. Human cloning is a highly debated issue right now, mainly because it is a very new possibility for the future. The obvious next step in the walk of technology, we have already cloned animals the ultimate goal would move on to clone the human race. Some people want to grab the idea and run with it, and others want to ban the idea without a second thought. Only time will tell what will actually become of human cloning. At first though, it seems scary. Who would want another you running around? Or even worse, you might have a clone and not even know about it, because someone took one of your cells, having stolen you DNA. Not only is this the cause of the scare, but also just think if it was another Adolf Hitler or Charles Manson running around. One thing that is good about cloning is that it can match the intelligence and appearance of the other person, so there would be no resemblance, but the nature of its upbringing and personality are totally dependent on the parents and the environment. This means that the second Adolf Hitler could end of winning the Nobel Piece Prize for his generosity and good deeds. The question would still remain will Mother Nature step and fix the problem that cloning humans would create? Every single person in the world is different, but in the case of cloning the DNA is the same so the people are the same, and is it true that with a change in environment and upbringings actually change a persons true nature. If two people are the same, the have the same character can end up being different. Personally I do not think so. I
Some topics in this essay:
Leon Kass,
Mother Nature,
University Hawaii,
Ian Wilmut,
Human Cloning,
Charles Manson,
Science Mice,
Piece Prize,
human cloning,
Adolf Hitler,
,
adolf hitler,
cloning humans,
god human,
adult cells,
clone person,
cloned mice,
mother nature,
people cloning,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1120
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Cloning Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|