Affermative Action
Two words that can bring about emotionally charged debates on the validity of this policy. Is it a fair practice, as proponents argue, or simply a form of reverse discrimination? It is not always been easy to decide on this issue -- for the Supreme Court or society. As it intended, affirmative action means that people from a particular group should enjoy special consideration or benefits in job placement or college admissions. Usually, when one speaks of affirmative action, it is in relation to racial discrimination (although women, as a minority group, are also included), and some people feel that the government should have unrestricted freedom in developing plans to make up for past offenses. Other people argue that enforcing this plan is little more than an obviouse reverse discrimination, and it should not be allowed. The Supreme Court has placed affirmative action plans into two basic groups--quota plans and race-plus plans. Under a quota plan, a state or local government has to use different criteria when considering someone of a minority group for a job or admission to a university. There is usually a quota for the number of people of the particular group who must be granted bene
According to Philadelphia Tribune writer, Bernard Anderson, Although white men comprise less than 40 percent of the labor force, they are 96 percent of corporate CEOs. Women hold only three to five percent of the senior-level or reverse discrimination. It is about helping people, in Michigan and the rest of the US, to get equal opportunity to contribute to our society. Among other things, a commitment to affirmative action, whether mandated by law or encouraged voluntarily produces vigilance, requiring employers (or college admissions officers) to act in a manner that ensures that women Yet affirmative action has long been at the center of social controversy. Some people continue to argue that two wrongs don't make a right, that just because there has been a history of discrimination against minority groups, giving them preferential treatment to the exclusion of other qualified workers is not a valid reason to enforce the policy. Others have just as passionately argued that only through affirmative action will we be able to correct the negative effects of decades of racial and gender discrimination (McWhirter, 1). If affirmative action is suppressed, it will (as stated by Constance Horner) diminish the historical standing of the United States as creator of exemplary solutions to the deepest dilemmas of civic life (3). There is a strength within the American culture, one which emphasizes a sense of fairness and a belief in racial integration. With it should be the presumption that the affirmative action policy will (if slowly) make positive social change (Horner, 3). Affirmative action should be considered pro-active behavior. It may mean that employers need to revise their priorities in their hiring practices, such as by not trying to fill a job vacancy with someone who replicates the person who has left, but this is a small price to pay. To the limited extent that we work in a more integrated environment, affirmative action is largely
Some topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
Gender Society,
Doverspike Winfred,
Falbaum PG,
Civil Rights,
Opportunity Department,
Constance Horner,
affirmative action,
PG Regardless,
Affirmative Action,
Rights Commission,
affirmative action policy,
action policy,
anderson 405,
racial gender,
white males,
race gender,
reverse discrimination,
405 affirmative,
college admissions,
405 affirmative action,
anderson 405 affirmative,
action recently,
affirmative action recently,
1 affirmative action,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1445
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|
Example Essays Home
