Animal Research
RESOLVED: THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION SEEING AS HOW ANIMAL TESTING IS INHUMANE AND IMMORAL.INTRODUCTION: Animal Cruelty One of the touchiest aspects of our relationship with animals is the use of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics and household products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, even though no law requires them not to. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists, are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experiments on live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quite all right for us to do whatever we like to animals. They say that God gave us such a right, since it is written in the bible (Genesis 1:26) that man has dominion over all creatures. If these tests give some educational value, or adds to scientific knowledge, or can help improve human health, they argue that it is worth killing animals or subjecting them to painful experiments. I believe that the unnecessary testing of animals is inhumane and unethical when alternative methods are available. So t! he government should stop animal testing.
TRANSITION: Animals injured in acute toxicity and eye irritancy tests are never treated. If the animals do not die from the effects of the experiments itself, they are either killed or used for an autopsy, or, if they are not badly injured, recycled and used for additional tests. Since the animals are not treated, these tests provide little useful knowledge for the treatment of humans who are exposed to the harmful substances. Dr. Gil Langley, a scientific neuro-chemist, states that: "Results (of animal tests) vary dramatically from laboratory to Albrecht 8 laboratory, between strains, sex, age, and species of animals, and extrapolation to humans in questionable."1 Animal tests have failed to provide the clear definition between harmful and harmless products that they were originally intended to provide. Therefore, regardless of animal testing, the consumer always becomes the so-called "guinea pig" for any new product.
Some topics in this essay:
Drug Administration,
Designs Technical,
MACMILLION INC,
Gil Langley,
Animal Cruelty,
Public Supporters,
Agarose Diffusion-Tiny,
Lethal Dose,
SOURCE Animal,
PRENTICE-HALL INTERNATIONAL,
animal testing,
animal experimentation,
draize test,
strontium 90,
neutral red,
eye irritancy,
source page,
animal tests,
human cells,
fifty percent,
government stop animal,
animal testing inhumane,
injected strontium 90,
cosmetics household products,
fifty percent animals,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2243
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Animal Research Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|