Animal Testing
Many animal activists are disappointed with the pace at which animal testing is being reduced, refined, and especially, replaced (the "Three Rs" of the alternatives approach). Considerable progress has been made, however, in the science of alternatives and in the attitudes among toxicologists and corporate decision-makers, as well as in developing government-based mechanisms for the regulatory acceptance of alternative methods.1 While there are scientific, financial, and regulatory obstacles to replacing animal testing, a comprehensive review of the history of technical and policy developments suggests that there will come a time when animals no longer are used in harmful testing of any kind. The safety testing of chemicals and consumer products probably accounts for only about 10 to 20 percent of the use of animals in laboratories, or approximately 2 to 4 million animals in the United States. The remaining 80 to 90 percent, or 16 -to 18 million animals, are used in basic and applied research, education, and other arenas. Yet the use of animals in safety testing figures prominently in the animal research controversy. It raises issues such as the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals, the propriety of harming
Potency testing and safety testing are not the only forms of testing. In 1962, following the thalidomide tragedy in which many infants were born with deformed or missing arms and legs, Congress required that, prior to marketing new drugs, companies should test not only for safety but also for efficacy, i.e., that drugs do what they claim to do. The safety testing of chemicals and products is a relatively recent development in history. While prominent people in antiquity may have had food tasters at their side to protect them from being poisoned, and coal miners in the 19th century used canaries to warn them of pockets of dangerous gases, the widespread testing of drugs, chemicals, consumer products, and foods has been going on for less than seventy years, essentially a feature of industrialized, consumer-driven society. Safety testing is a multifaceted process. It includes testing chemicals to see if they do or do not have adverse effects; for example, can a chemical cause birth defects, cancer, organ failure, or some other problem? This is known as "hazard identification" or "hazard assessment." There is also the nuanced issue of whether a chemical is likely to be a problem in the real world given practical issues such as
Some topics in this essay:
Testing Safety,
,
Safety Testing,
Cosmetic Act,
safety testing,
Elixir Sulfanilamide,
testing safety testing,
testing safety,
chemicals products,
testing chemicals,
safety testing safety,
safety testing chemicals,
chemicals consumer products,
potency testing,
eye skin irritancy,
skin irritancy,
eye skin,
testing drugs,
chemicals consumer,
forms testing,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 832
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Animal Testing Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|