Enron-v- Andersen
1. The possible stockholders in this situation are the stockholders, the FDA, the Law firms, all of the accountant firm’s ea. The Big Five & Enron, the waste management services. The parties that are involved directly would be Enron, the stockholders, the Law offices, the Enron workers, George W. Bush (Arthur Anderson was a big help in getting him elected into office), and the Wall Street Journal.2. Gross Misconduct-Behavior not conforming to prevailing standard or laws. Negligence-Dishonest or Bad management by persons entrusted or engaged to act on another’s behalf. Arthur Andersen is guilty of Gross Misconduct because they did not adhere to the laws established by GAAP. Their rights to be an auditing firm can be taken away, and then they can also
6. Yes Arthur Andersen did since they shredded the documents they took away from the sight of the information. The documents that they shredded might have been the answer that was there all along. be taken to court on not adhering to the laws established. workers working for Enron were accountants for Andersen. They risks and potential dangers that can result from allowing this to happen can be that they can merge documents to make fake ones or even the code of conduct can be messed with. 3. It should be illegal to work for a firm that is your client, the example are the Yes, They are since the users are paying the right to stock they should be given the chance to know what is going on.
Some topics in this essay:
Gross Misconduct,
Code Conduct,
Arthur Andersen,
Five Enron,
Negligence-Dishonest Bad,
FDA Law,
Arthur Anderson,
Gross Misconduct-Behavior,
,
Street Journal,
arthur andersen,
laws established,
accountants andersen,
shredding documents,
enron accountants,
enron accountants andersen,
shredded documents,
code conduct,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 512
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
