Ghandi
Gandhi knew the path. It was straight and narrow. Gandhi believed that from his weakness he failed a thousand times, but he would not lose faith. His soul refused to be satisfied so long as it is a helpless witness of a single wrong or a single misery (Brown 3). But it was not possible for him, a weak, frail being, to mend every wrong or to hold himself free of blame for all the wrong that he saw. The spirit in him pulled one way, the flesh in him pulled in the opposite direction. There was freedom from the action of these two forces, but that freedom was attainable only by slow and painful stages. Gandhi could not attain freedom by a mechanical refusal to act, but only by intelligent action in a detached manner (Brown 11). This struggle resolves itself into an incessant crucifixion of the flesh so that the spirit may become entirely free (Brown 15).Gandhi was a seeker of truth. He claimed to have found a way to it. He claimed to be making a ceaseless effort to find it. Gandhi admitted that he had not yet found it. To find truth completely is to realize oneself and one's destiny, that is, to become perfect. He was painfully conscious of his imperfection, which is where his strength lied, because it was a rare thing for a man
Its teaching has so far permeated people that an armed revolution has almost become an impossibility in India not because they as a race are physically weak, but because the tradition of ahimsa has struck deep root among the people (Nair 134). In today’s world, three different types of situations can be aided through the practice of Satyagraha. They are self, family, and work (Settle (155). Once the true understanding of the term Satyagraha is developed, it becomes possible for conflicts within these situations to become resolved (Gandhi 52). Gandhi’s hunger strikes, marches, and civil disobedience acts were crucial towards his accomplishment of peace. His followers were very faithful and were able to make a statement that got the attention of the British government. The principle of Satyagraha worked well in a country such as India because of its strong religious spirituality (Dalton 124). Indians are highly dedicated and motivated when it comes to the topic of faith. Poverty is everywhere in the country, and faith becomes central to one’s life. Gandhi had a great deal of success in showing to the world just exactly how nonviolent resistance could make a difference. He was a very educated man and possessed the qualities necessary to be a great leader. He disagreed with the methods put forward by Western civilization (Attenborough 86). Westerners were fond of good cheer and in need of having a good time. The British were perceived as having little or no self-control. British and Indian cultures are so different, how could an interaction between the two ever be successful? It is much easier to look back and say what could have been done. The British overstayed their welcome in India, although they were never really invited in the first place. The British imposed their views onto another culture. They were rude, disrespectful, and degrading to another country on that country’s soil. Yet Gandhi was able to teach the British and the rest of the world something about nonviolence and its positive results (Dalton 221). The term Satyagraha is very complex and is accompanied with great dedication. To fight back without violence takes a huge amount of inner self control, a certain peace of mind, and the physical ability not to strike back( Payne 57). The country of India was able to show to the world that nonviolent resistance can make a difference. It is peaceful and the enemy is able to step back and see what the opposing side is trying to accomplish. In conclusion, the works of Gandhi were very successful. He was able to prove that the country of India, which was thought not to have power, did indeed possess an enormous amount of power. He showed that this power was different, because India’s power did not lie in the use of weapons or money. Rather India’s power was found within Satyagraha. What Gandhi accomplished was inspiring and he showed Westerners a new way to deal with conflict. It is very hard to prove a point to another culture with extremely different thoughts and beliefs. Yet it is a great accomplishment to make others acknowledge a new way of resolving conflicts with their enemies. Gandhi was one of the greatest religious and social leaders that ever lived. His death was a one that sent shockwaves around the globe. His personal friend Jawaharlal Nehru best sums up his death: The main idea behind Gandhi's belief was non-violence. The words of the Sanskrit language: ahinsa and sayagraha clearly express Gandhi's beliefs. The former means non-killing, non-destructive and the latter means the force of universal truth (Dalton 38). He believed that the killing of man or beast is an unforgivable sin (Bains 22). Many who promoted these teachings of Gandhi simply believed that it was their only option for resisting imperialism rather than having a moral conviction towards his teachings (Dalton 43). He taught that the weapon that could be used was the conscience of the aggressor. This ahimsa is, to some deg
Some topics in this essay:
Fischer Essential,
Hinduism Hinduism,
Fischer Gandhi,
Mahatma Gandhi,
Gandhi Attenborough,
,
British Indian,
According Hinduism,
Jawaharlal Nehru,
Buddhism Hinduism,
fischer essential,
fischer gandhi,
spirit god,
term satyagraha,
country india,
god gandhi,
hinduism hinduism,
spirit god gandhi,
gandhi regard,
life lived,
koran inspired,
trying save scorpion,
nonviolent resistance difference,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 3184
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Ghandi Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|