Ulysses Grant
Many common portrayals of Ulysses Grant suggest an implement of war with him serving his cause as a sort of killing machine. Also, a major point readily brought out into the open is the accusation of political corruption during his seemingly awkward presidential term. In William S. McFeely’s, Grant: A Biography, the former military leader and president of the United States is presented as an ordinary man, based on personal accounts with family, friends, associates at WestPoint, and military peers. Although drawn in by the interest of race relations prior to Grant entering the White House and following his presidency, the author could not use this to justify his biography. McFeely looks to the man himself, with the vision of a mild small man seen in many civil war photographs. While the book does not strictly praise or critique Grant the author is presenting a much more modest and appealing aspect of a man who has been referred to as a callus and corrupt individual. Grant, in the author’s eyes, was an ordinary man, exceptional by no means other than the single gift of having the ability to apply his talents to something that actually drew his attention and interest. While being considerably unsucc
essful as a businessman prior to serving as a military leader and ranked amongst the bottom of the American presidents through the years, his interest that had filled him with the inspiration to act as a leader and major contributor to American history is the Civil War. Grant longed for approval and to be revered, and going to war allowed him to do just this. He possessed a common sense about him having no patience for extravagant theories of authority figures while at WestPoint or politically speaking. This, along with his fluctuating yet substantial self-confidence is what allowed him to make himself into such a prominent figure of the time. Many lived though him and this praise he had won as a general was enough to vote him into office. While I extracted favorable qualities of Grant from this book, it is thought by several reviewers that McFeely is concentrating on Grant as being ordinarily plain with no evidence of outstanding talent. Richard N. Current, a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro states how the biography shies away from the Civil War general and presidential shortcomings, and looks into “a great deal about the personal vicissitudes of a nondescript nineteenth century American.” Despite this difference in opinion, I did find the book interesting, discussing Grant on a personal level. Current calls it the “most fascinating account of its subjects personal and family life.” It is a valued addition on the personal level of one of the major contributors to Amer
Some topics in this essay:
War Grant,
History Channel,
White House,
American” Despite,
Grant Biography,
Ulysses Grant,
Civil War,
civil war,
Richard Current,
Carolina Greensboro,
american history civil,
history civil war,
war grant,
common sense,
military leader,
personal level,
opinion book,
civil war grant,
american history,
history civil,
grant biography,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1034
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Ulysses Grant Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|