Example Essays Home

FAQ

Acceptable Use Policy

Tech Support

LOG IN!

Click HERE for Instant Access

This is a free preview of the paper.

Join Now
Log In

Hamlet

In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the main character exhibits a mysterious and ambiguous nature. The state of Hamlet’s sanity becomes a prevalent question throughout the play as contradictions in his character are revealed. In the play Hamlet faces an internal struggle brought on by the Ghost of dead King Hamlet. He must seek revenge for his father’s murder by killing Claudius. However, by taking on this responsibility, Hamlet must confront his own fears of death and the consequences of committing murder. Stemming from this battle within him are two conflicting behaviors seen in Hamlet throughout the play. One is of a calm, rational, and well-spoken man. The other is of a man consumed with madness. Hamlet’s mood shifts between the two continuously and causes one to question if he has truly become mad or if he has a well-calculated plan “To put an antic disposition on” (I, iv, 171) as he tells Horatio and Marcellus early on in the play.

The first signs of Hamlet’s possible madness come from his behavior towards Ophelia. In a conversation with Polonius she reveals to him her perception of Hamlet in his recent visit. She states that he came to her “with a look so piteous in purport, as if he had been loos

has appeared. Every other time, others could see the Ghost. Yet, in this scene it only appears to Hamlet. This may occur because of the irrational state of mind he is in. Therefore, Hamlet’s perceived madness was part of his plan and only when his emotions overtook him in the presence of Gertrude did he truly cross the line into true madness.

In the same scene, two other events are indicative of Hamlet’s madness. He horrifies his mother by blindly killing Polonius, who is hidden behind the arras. He somewhat dismisses the murder by calling Polonius a “wretched, rash intruding fool.” (III, iv, 33) However, in Act V, Hamlet tells Laertes that Polonius was killed in madness.

And when he’s not himself does wrong Laertes,

In another confrontation with Ophelia, Hamlet again appears to be fairly irrational. When Ophelia meets him to return his gifts, he claims, “You should not have believed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of it. I loved you not.” (III, i, 115-116) However, during Ophelia’s funeral in Act V, Hamlet leaps into the grave in grief and says, “I loved Ophelia. Forty thousand brothers could not with all their quantity of love make up my sum.” (V, i, 221-223) From these two conflicting actions, one must question Hamlet’s true feelings for Ophelia. Was he merely acting mad when he claimed to have never loved her? From his show of overwhelming grief upon her death, it appears that he did indeed love her and had carefully planned to convince her otherwise. Perhaps true madness finally overtook him at her funeral and compelled him to reveal himself by jumping into her grave. (Munro, par. 2)

Some topics in this essay:
Ernest Jones, King Hamlet, Ophelia Forty, Hamlet Hamlet, Act III, Horatio Marcellus, Polonius Ophelia, Ophelia Polonius, Act Hamlet, Hamlet Ghost, throughout play, act iii, truly mad, act hamlet, actions towards, act iii scene, iii scene, hamlet’s madness, iii iv, iii scene ii, towards ophelia, hamlet reveals, hamlet’s actions towards,