Well it depends because gambling in general is considered to be a matter of state concern, and each state has regulated gambling activities independently. Lets take for example, Nevada, a state where gambling is essential to the state’s economy. On the other hand, the state of Utah is completely opposed to any means of gambling for the inhabitants of its state . Since there is so much discrepancy on the state level, the federal government decided that it is going to enact laws to hinder gambling.

As a result of all the inconsistencies on the state level, Congress decided that it was going to instill its own regulations on gambling via the control interstate commerce2. Nonetheless, the federal government enacted these regulations prior to the launch of internet gambling. They include: The Wire Wagner Act, The Travel Act, The Interstate Transportation of Wagering Paraphernalia Act, The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act.

“Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce

However, this law doesn't quite bridge the gap to Internet gambling because it requires an actual, physical “wire” (i.e, telephone) to connect the two parties placing and accepting the wagers. There are no wires in cyberspace. Not to mention the fact that there are wireless connections to the internet these days via cell phones and other handheld electronics such as personal digital assistants (pda), and the Wire Wagner Act would not apply . Also, this act specifically punishes those “engaged in the business of wagering,” so if anyone is at fault, it's the casino or the bookmakers who established the online sites, not the gamblers. Regardless of these shortcomings, the Wire Wager Act includes language that is open enough to allow the law to serve as the primary purpose in the effort to place the operators of online gambling businesses in a criminal engaging position.

The Interstate Transportation of Wagering Paraphernalia Act prohibits:

“any person to sponsor, operate, advertise or promote, pursuant to the law or compact of a governmental entity, a . . . betting, gambling, or wagering scheme

Some topics in this essay:
Gambling Internet, Gambling NCALG, Wager Act, Travel Act, Nevada Delaware, Protection Act, Gambling Regulated, Paraphernalia Act, , Federal Laws, internet gambling, interstate foreign, foreign commerce, interstate foreign commerce, online gambling, bets wagers, wagering paraphernalia act, transportation wagering, interstate transportation, travel act, transportation wagering paraphernalia, wagner act, wire wagner, sports protection act, professional amateur sports,