Wills uses factual evidence to back his declarations. In the first paragraph of his essay, Wills strives to introduce examples of censorship against censure to the reader. He does this with accounts of several different instances in which censure has been used. He speaks of feminists joining “reactionaries to denounce pornography.” He narrates of how the rock musician Frank Zappa accused Tipper Gore, the wife of Al Gore, of launching an “conspiracy to exhort” when she asked that sexually explicit materials be labeled with warnings and of how Penthouse magazine charges Terry Rakolta, a house wife

Wills uses rhetorical questions to promote censure as well. In his essay, he bring about the opposing argument that “only the narrow-minded are in tolerant” since many narrow- minded people will criticize and censure some demonstrations even though they my not be totally educated about the subject at hand. Hence, they should supposedly not have the right to criticize these “negative” aspects of society He defends his place with these metaphorical questions, “So do we guarantee freedom of speech only for the broad-minded or the better educated? Can one speak only after studying whatever one has reason, from one’s beliefs, to denounce? Then most of us would be doing a great deal less speaking than we do.” These queries help support the fact that narrow-mindedness is not to blame in this situation. Furthermore, Wills claim in his essay that liberals, who denounce censorship, have made a mistake by giving into the right-winger’s concerns for morality. He continues his argument, !

In conclusion, Wills’ application of factual evidence, authorative testimonies, and rhetorical questions all assist in defending his positions on censure throughout the essay. The factual evidence and authorative testimonies give Wills a reliable account to help defend censure as counter to censorship. The rhetorical questions persuade the reader to come to the same assumptions as the author about liberals and narrow mindedness. All of these stra

Some topics in this essay:
Frank Zappa, Beastie Boys�not, Robert Maplethorpe, Censure” Wills, Amendment Constitution, Furthermore Wills, Donna Shalala, Northwestern University, Sesame Street, Terry Rakolta, rhetorical questions, factual evidence, authorative testimony, factual evidence authorative, evidence authorative, evidence authorative testimonies, persuade reader, authorative testimonies, frank zappa, wills strives, censorship wills, “in praise censure”, freedom speech,