Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Tiananmen square- govt reactions

Twelve years ago the Chinese Government lost patience with a student movement calling for democracy in Tiananmen square. They ordered the peoples army to turn their weapons on the people. The bloody suppression of the students effectively smashed the pro- democracy movement and drove dissent underground. The recent publishing of the Tiananmen Papers has reminded the world of the tragic events of June 1989, when students challenged the legitimacy of the Chinese Government. The issues which fueled the protest are still present in China today; lack of political freedom, corruption and unemployment. But public displays of dissent are rare and Tiananmen square remains under constant surveillance.

The student movement started with a yearning to commemorate the reformer Hu Yaobang, who had died on April 15. To be sure, there was a provocative edge to the students' behaviour, attributable to the relatively freewheeling atmosphere the government had tolerated during the strong reform push of the previous few years. By bringing their slogans off the campuses into Tiananmen Square, the centre of the capital city the students further stuck their noses at Party control. Still, most of them stayed within the bounds of certain pieties, the


y acknowledged Party leadership and positioned themselves in a respectful if disappointed, supporters of the Party's long-term reform project.

At a Standing Committee meeting on May 16, Zhao nonetheless continued to argue that the way to end the hunger strike was to accept the students' demand to change the verdict of the April 26 editorial. The break in the leadership was now critical and had to be taken to Deng. On the morning of May 17, Deng made the decision to side with Li. Moreover, he drew the logical conclusion: the need for martial law. In a Standing Committee meeting later that day, Zhao and Li continued to clash, and the Standing Committee split on martial law, 2-2-1, with Qiao Shi abstaining. The Elders then stepped in, firing Zhao, using Li Peng to implement their plans for repression, and selecting Jiang Zemin to succeed Zhao Ziyang once peace was restored.

The students believed that if they ended the demonstrations while the protests were still officially considered turmoil, they would be exposed to harsh punishment. Only if their movement was labeled "patriotic" and "democratic," they felt, could they safely withdraw from the Square to end their movement. So the paradoxical effect of Deng Xiaoping's verdict was to raise the stakes so high that the students became trapped in the Square. There they served as a magnet for others who joined them as the stalemate continued.

Some topics in this essay:
Li Peng, Deng Xiaoping, Intellectuals Square, Chinese Government, People's Daily, Standing Committee, Tiananmen Square, Committee June, Zhao Ziyang, Mikhail Gorbachev, li peng, tiananmen square, standing committee, student movement, april 26, standing committee meeting, reform matter, committee meeting, political reform, martial law, hunger strike,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1515
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers