sees the system as completely unacceptable. It is only safe to say “reasonable” because there

are many different cultures in the world that do not think exactly like Americans. Nor do

they have the same taste. In that sense, they observe with a diverse pair of ordinary eyes.

These eye magnets do not intentionally, but habitually judge on what they believe is gold-

medal material. Are judges still considered the innocent ones when caught on tape giving

The difference of opinion and style of judging, is based primarily on background.

Artistry is huge in some cultures, but not so significant in others. Obviously, it also varies in

style from country to country. Russian and Eastern Europeans tend to lean more towards

ballet and presentation, while many Westerners feel that flawless lifts, jumps, and twirls are

essential. Many judges like to see figure skaters having “control” over their routine. Some

traditional judges have backgrounds in music or theatre, meaning they are more inclined to

etc.? Favoritism illustrated by a panel of judges can be displayed in three of the

Some topics in this essay:
RATING USA, Eastern Europeans, Americans Nor, Le Gougne, Championships Helsinki, Baiul Ukraine, Illegitimate Judging, Ulrich Salchow, Russian French, Christopher Dean, gold medal, marks rating usa, salt lake city, 58 1, panel judges, technical marks, le gougne, figure skating, world championships, marks rating, ice skating judges, technical marks rating, ice dancers, salt lake,