There were many differences between the novel and film. One such difference was that in the film the director Mr. Huston did not bother to add pointless stories like in the novel. A pointless story that was in the book but pointless in the film was the story with the man named Flitcraft that left his family because he so had a near death experience, it was a good choice of the film director Houston because I thought that the story had to do with the mai

In conclusion back-stabbing , lies, and greed is what the story is based on. These examples are all brief summarized as you read. Story wise this novel was great and I highly recommend it for people who have the greed and the back stabbing personality, this way they will have a brief overview of what they might be leaded to in their future.

One character that the director did a lame job in my opinion was the short young man known as Wilmer. In the novel the author expressed Wilmer as a young man about 20 to 21 years old. In the film Wilmer looks like a man who is in his mid 30’s. I believe that the man who played Wilmer in the film did not fit his role which made me upset.

n plot. Another difference in the film is that Houston completely cut out Gutman’s daughter, Rhea Gutman from the film. A further difference between the both is that in the end of the novel Tom Polaus came into Gutman’s room were Brigid and Spade were and told Polaus that Wilmer just shot Gutman when they got there, but in the fi

Some topics in this essay:
Cairo Cairo, Wilmer Cairo, Humphrey Bogart’s, Maltese Falcon, O’ Shaughnessy, Spade Spade, Rhea Gutman, Polaus Wilmer, Tom Gutman’s, Brigid Spade, lame job, houston lame job, difference film, little film, film difference, film director, gutman film, written version, actors performances, director houston, houston lame,