adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passage of time for human

society. Systems have been developed to regulate, direct and control

the resources of this society. The systems are referred to as

governments and the resources as the populace or inhabitants and

forces of production. A government must be dynamic in its nature

reflecting the change in society. At times these systems have resisted

the necessity to adapt with its components (Society) creating a

deficit between the system and those it regulates. As the deficits

develop, they cause instability, and could lead to revolution.1

Theories have been developed to explain the systemic

phenomenon called revolution. This paper will discuss three modern

theories and apply them to the English revolution of 1640. The first

theory, developed by Carl Marx (Marxism), will address the economic

evolution in English society. This theory will emphasize and explain

how the shift from a feudal/mercantile system to capitalism affected

English society. The second, called the Resource Mobilization Theory

(RMT) developed by Charles Tilly, will explain

had the largest industrialized economy during the 1800's. The

aggression which characterizes an organization contending for power in

Marxism rising bouroeisie, were the unfortunate targets of this

and the failings of Charles I run into difficulties when confronted

anarchy. The evolution of the English economic system during the 16th

Some topics in this essay:
Capital Marx, England Ireland, Theory Human, Institutional Theory, Goldstone Revolutions, Protestants Catholics, Crown Parliament, RMT Parliament, England's Crown, Civil War, crown parliament, mobilization theory, resource mobilization, control resources, term factors, carl marx, socio-economic changes, forces production, resource mobilization theory, institutional theory, 16th 17th centuries, term factors revolution, samuel huntington's institutional, charles tilly, huntington's institutional theory,