National Standards
For the past 10 years a movement has been developing in education. A growing discontentment with the level of performance in our public school students has caused administrators, teachers, parents and politicians to seek a way to better prepare our children to compete successfully in an emerging global economy. What is being proposed are standards, an attempt to increase student achievement and to align schools to have a certain level of coherence in curriculum. Although it sounds logical, even attractive, standards have been plagued with controversy. Supporters contend that standards will benefit public schools in many ways. Some benefits noted are that standards will: · Communicate that all students can achieve at a higher level. · Create a demand for new improved assessments. Other supporters say that national standards will: · Hold schools and teachers accountable. · Bring national cohesion and uniformity to teacher training and student expectations therefore easing geographic mobility. · Succeed at uplifting the poor and disadvantaged. Two success stories of the standards movement that have been cited exist in Texa
This view of educational renewal would not be linear but dynamic. No longer will test results determine curriculum decisions or teacher strategy but would be a real measure of student learning and growth. We would break away from the one-size fits all trap. Standards, if created using AFT criteria, require that “they be designed to guide, not limit,” that they “include multiple performance levels (Gandal, 1995).” Using NCEST recommendations we would be holding schools, districts, and states accountable for learning, not just achieving on high-stakes tests. This is because the council asks that, “other assessments capable of producing results for individual students be combined with large scale sampling assessments (O’Neil, 1993).” Intelligences: (which project will cover) 3) Use propaganda Techniques (1-5) These are just a few of many complaints pundits have of the standards movement. Others question the possibility of creating standards that apply equally to all students, a one size fits all approach, John O’Neil asks:
Some topics in this essay:
Hurwitz Hurwitz,
,
Federation Teachers,
Palonsky Carlson,
Testing NCEST,
Texas Chicago’s,
John O’Neil,
Rubrics Peer,
Brooks Imagine,
Texas Chicago,
· standards,
student performance,
hurwitz hurwitz 2000,
hurwitz 2000,
performance standards,
hurwitz hurwitz,
student learning,
standardized tests,
national standards,
palonsky carlson,
gandal 1995,
palonsky carlson 2000,
student performance standards,
producing results individual,
capable producing results,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1688
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on National Standards Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|