Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Plato Ethics

Analysis of Socrates Argument with Polus

If something is wanted (P) for oneself then one must think that it (P) would be good for oneself. So, wanting something [P] (for oneself) requires one to think that [P] will be good (for oneself). Thus, it is a necessary condition for wanting something [P] for oneself, that [P] is good for oneself. Using this as his main thesis Socrates shows that tyrants do not have great power since they do not do what they want. In addition, they do what they want because they do not know what is good, and so they frequently do what is bad for themselves.

Socrates Main Premises and Conclusion

Polus: Tyrants and Orators have great power.

Socrates: Tyrants do not have great power since they do not do what they want. And they do what they want because they lack knowledge of their good, and so frequently do what is bad for themselves.

P1 = If one does something [ Z ] for the sake of some other end[ J ], then it is that end [ J ] one wants, and not [ Z ] the doing of an act itself. Simply: if one does [Z] in order to get (or for the sake of) [ J ]then ----* one wants [J], not [Z].

P2 = However, one only does anything [ Z ]


17. [16] + ([8] or [9]) = We want those things that are good for oneself. We do not want those things that are intermediate (neither good nor bad), nor do we want those things that are bad for oneself (or harmful to oneself.)

P4 = If one can only wants what is good for oneself, then he cannot want things that are bad for oneself. [Negation of Premise 3]

for the sake of [ J ]obtaining good things for oneself. If one does something, then he does it for the sake of obtaining a good thing for himself.

15. Whenever one does things, one does the intermediate thing for the sake of the good things. It is because we peruse what is good that we do intermediate things, we suppose (i.e. we think) that it is better for us to do an intermediate thing instead of not doing it.

8. It is always the case (it is universally true) that: when one does anything thing [Z] in order to get (or for the sake of) something else [J] then, one always wants [J] and not the thing is doing [Z].

Some topics in this essay:
Argument Polus, Tyrants Orators, Tyrant Orator, Socrates Tyrants, Main Thesis, Tyrant Orators, Negation Premise, Socrates Polus, Procession Argument, nor bad, doing doing, bad oneself, neither nor bad, 9 =, oneself oneself, socrates main, tyrants orators, tyrants power, neither nor, orators tyrants, Socrates Main, socrates tyrants power, frequently bad themselves, orators amount power,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1336
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Plato Ethics


Professional Papers:
Plato and Aristotle and Reason1326 words
Plato ampamp Aristotle ampamp Issue of Abortion1081 words
Aristotle, Plato, Dante1638 words
Ethics: When is justifiable to violate the law3511 words
NICOMACHEAN ETHICS1209 words
ARISTOTLEamp39S ESSAY ON THE NATURE OF ETHICS783 words



Student Written Papers:
Maxim Ethics: Platos Rules to Obtain the Good Life592 words
Maxim Ethics: Platos Rules To Obtain The Good Life628 words
Maxim Ethics: Platos Rules to Obtain the Good Life592 words
Aristotle and Plato1206 words
Plato ampamp Aristotle1018 words

Look at even more essays on Plato Ethics
More Misc Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers