Surrogacy
Children are miracles that are created by people in an act of love, however in the last few years new technological advances creates substitutions to having a child instead of a man and woman getting together. These substitutions are made for people who are not able to conceive a child naturally. One substitution is having a surrogate mother in the creation of a child, however, this causes some controversy with the process of how it is performed and accomplished. Surrogacy is when a married couple asks another woman to carry their child inside her body for them. There are three types of surrogacy traditional (AI) surrogacy, gestational surrogacy, and donor egg/ gestational surrogacy. All three of these surrogacy types involve the intended parents of the child and a willing woman. There are numerous resources on this issue, I chose three that gave equal stances on both sides of the surrogacy issue. The first was a book entitled: “Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers, and Fathers,” by Helena Ragone, which centers on the motivations for all those involved. The second was an article: “A Successful Surrogate Arrangement,” by Susan S. Fricks, this delved into the components of a successful surrogate
Ragone’s language in this piece gradually changes from the ethos of the topic to the logos behind the argument, then finally moves into pathos language to wrap up the article. The language style of ethos, ethics, was present when the author addressed the question of the surrogate mother’s motivation. The author goes into the ethical debate within surrogate motivation and that is the idea of altruism versus remuneration. “The symbol of the pure surrogate who creates a child for love was pitted against the symbol of the wicked surrogate who prostitutes her maternity.” (Ragone. 69) This is stating that those “pure” surrogates are against the “wicked” surrogates, which states the idea of altruism precludes remuneration through the use of connotative language by the author. By using ethos, logos, pathos, and connotative language the authors of the three articles appealed to an audience composed of potential surrogates, infertile couples looking at options, and those curious about surrogacy. The authors used ethos as a way of showing the ethics involved in the issue being addressed. They used logos as a way of backing up their claims and pathos to grab the reader’s attention. The use of connotative language made the audience want to read closely, or they might miss a hidden meaning being expressed by the author. Mostly, the authors used the rhetorical tools successfully for their articles, however, Tarnoff could of been more clear on her point in writing her article. The controversy of surrogacy is a hard issue to fully support one way or another. arrangement. The third was also an article entitled “All in the Family: Using a Family Member as Surrogate,” written by Shelley Tarnoff, and went into the issues a couple faces if they use a relative as their surrogate. The authors use different tones and lang
Some topics in this essay:
Shelley Tarnoff,
Arrangement” Fricks,
,
Susan Fricks,
Overall Ragone’s,
connotative language,
Helena Ragone,
Ragone Fricks,
using family,
using family surrogate,
Family Surrogate”,
fricks 1,
family surrogate,
article “a,
successful surrogate,
Successful Surrogate,
Surrogate Arrangement”,
logos connotative language,
ragone’s language,
idea altruism,
logos connotative,
surrogate arrangement”,
article “a successful,
“a successful surrogate,
successful surrogate arrangement”,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1259
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Surrogacy Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|