 |
|
 |
| |
The Speluncean Explorers |
The Case of the Speluncean Explorers The most important element to consider in the case of the Speluncean Explorers is that of common sense. We must not allow this to get lost among the complexities of argument. The letter of the law was written based on human morals and ideals and should not cease to be so today or ever. This is why in this particular instance it is not wrong to allow our sympathies for these unfortunate men to weigh on our opinions. First let us consider the fact that the five trapped men, after learning that it would be atleast ten more days until they were rescued, sought a professional medical opinion as to whether or not they could possibly survive this duration. Upon being informed that they would not, they diliberated for eight hours after which they sought council first from the physician, then from a government offical, and finally from a minister as to whether or not it would be advisable to cast lots and kill and consume one of their members so that the others may survive. None of the three parties were willing to answer. Note that no one answered in the affirmative or negative. With their question unanswered, the men severed radio contact with the people outside. |
| |
|
|
| |
The purpose of law is to protect civilized society from the threat which any individual may pose. I find it rediculous to claim that any of the four defendants poses any sort of threat on society. The choice the defendants made was one that the physicians, government officials, and ministers knew they might also make, hence their respective refusals to advise the explorers on their heavy question. No one among us can say what we would have done if placed in the predicament the defendednts found themselves in. None of us can say positively that we would answer to the negative. Common sense tells us that these unfortunate men have not committed a crime which is punishable, when we know we may have made the same choice ourselves. I conclude that the conviction should be set aside. Not only did the manner in which the unfortunate men decided to adopt their idea have a sort of democratic notion to it, in that all members had to agree, but the casting of lots is in and of itself as fair and democratic a method of choosing one of the five as the situation would allow. Whetmore, who originally proposed the plan and the method of casting lots, tried to withdraw from the agreement when lots were about to be cast (citeing a desire to wait another week before carrying out the plan) but was charged with a “breach of faith” by his companions and had the die (with which the lots were being cast) thrown for him. When asked if he had any objections to the fairness of the throw, Whetmore said he had none. The posing of this question signifies that the members did not wish to target him in any way and truly wanted the lots to be cast fairly even if it meant their own life. Furthermore, in a week’s time it was highly possible that they would all be dead. The physician had told them that they would not survive ten days. He had not told them how long they would survive. A week is obviously nearly ten days and thus the proposal to wait a week was illogical and could have easily been deemed by the members, probably acurately, as a momentary submission to weakness (or fear) on Whetmor
Some topics in this essay:
Speluncean Explorers, common sense, lots cast, speluncean explorers, wait week, “breach faith”, ten days, casting lots, 100 percent approval, matter life death, objections fairness throw, human life, agreed reenter, explorers left die, life death, value human life,
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
RELATED ESSAYS |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
 |
The Speluncean Explorers This case is about five members of the Speluncean Society (the "Members "), an organization of amateurs interested in the exploration of caves. .... |
| | |
 |
blah .... At one point in time there was a Supreme Court murder case of the Speluncean explorers. The Speluncean explorers were members of .... |
| | |
 |
law .... In "The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, " different school may have different opinion, thus, regarding in different conclusions. .... |
| | |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
PROFESSIONAL ESSAYS |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Renaissance An essay or paper on Renaissance. Renaissance ran roughly from mid-15th century until early 17th century (BookRags). |
| | |
 |
Renaissance An essay or paper on Renaissance. Renaissance was a period of rapid artistic and cultural development that celebrated |
| | |
 |
Renaissance An essay or paper on Renaissance. Renaissance is a French term that equates to rebirth. In so doing, term accurately depicts |
| | |
 |
Tempest An essay or paper on Tempest. modernist view believes, and values. Following modernists, Postmodernists like founder of. |
| | |
 |
Women in US An essay or paper on Women in US. Women in United States need to look realistically at their own status in social and |
| | |
 |
Music of Renaissance An essay or paper on Music of Renaissance. Between years of 1450 and 1600s, music was profoundly affected by great upheaval of Renaissance. |
| | |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
JOIN NOW |
 |
| |
Get instant access to over 80,000 papers.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
TESTIMONIALS |
 |
| |
"I got the best grade I've ever gotten A+"
Mary P.
"This information was helpful and easy to find."
Kris D.
"This site is so helpful! You have opened my eyes to learning thank you!"
Karen F.
"I liked the information that you gave to me because it helped me do a analytical essay for this short story and i give it a 10/10 =) "
Dave M.
"This website is very helpful and informative and well worth it's money. Thanks!"
Sean R.
|
|
|
|