War On Drugs
In our contemporary society, the media constantly bombards us with horror stories about drugs like crack-cocaine. From them, and probably from no other source, we learn that crack is immediately addictive in every case, we learn that it causes corruption, crazed violence, and almost always leads to death. The government tells us that we are busy fighting a war on drugs and so it gives us various iconic models to despise and detest : we learn to stereotype inner-city minorities as being of drug-infested wastelands and we learn to "witchhunt" drug users within our own communities under the belief that they represent moral sin and pure evil. I believe that these titles and ideals are preposterous and based entirely upon unnecessary and even detrimental ideals promoted by the government to achieve purposes other than those they claim. In Craig Renarman's and Harry Levine's article entitled "The Crack Attack : Politics and Media in America's Latest Drug Scare," the authors attempts to expose and to deal with some of the societal problems that have related from the over-exaggeration of crack-cocaine as an "epidemic problem" in our country. Without detracting attention away from the serio
II. Application of Theoretical Framework And even if treated as health problem, drugs should still not be treated as an epidemic health problem. Reinarman and Levine discussed how throughout our nation's history, various "drug scares" have been instigated by the need for various economic controls. According to them, laws against drugs have traditionally been created to suppress various groups whose activities were counterproductive to the government. And yet today, Ed D'Angelo (1994) still points out that the chiefly publicized reason for anti-drug laws is "to protect public health and safety." So why then are drugs not treated as a public health problem as Perrine suggests they should? Finally, Dorfman (1993) evaluates and discusses the importance of counter-ads to our "war on drugs" (and to social problems in general). In doing so, she modestly contradicts Reinarman and Levine's assertion that drug advertising promotes drug use. Dorfman (1993) sees a reasonable quality in the testimonials of some of these advertisements and from a both a general and a Puritan perspective, one could easily see how she feels that the effective use of such advertisements can help keep society away from drugs. But I have noted that what Dorfman still fails to do is to examine the genuine cost-effectiveness of counter-ads to determine whether or not they are, or would be-- over-exaggerated in this perceived "war against drugs."
Some topics in this essay:
Reinarman Levine,
IV Conclusion,
Literature Summary,
Ed D'Angelo,
Reinarman Levine's,
According Puritan,
According Rumbarger's,
Finally D'Angelo,
Holland Perrine,
Renarman Levine,
reinarman levine,
war drugs,
d'angelo 1994,
johnson et,
et al,
johnson et al,
et al 1995,
health risks,
crack epidemic,
inner-city minorities,
evolutionary history,
mid-1980's government,
reinarman levine suggest,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1948
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on War On Drugs Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|