Fandom... Frenzied Crowd, Obsessed Loner or In Between?
Fans have been criticised heavily via the press as well as academic works. They have been given evil associations and stereotypes hugely based on the news coverage and opinions of extreme cases such as that of Mark David Chapman and John Hinckley. Joli Jenson mentions these cases briefly to give an example of the obsessive loner type as opposed to the frenzied crowd member in her academic piece, ‘Fandom as Pathology: The consequences of Characterisation’. Again, both these definitions are negative opinions on the fan, but the text also touches on the way some people blame the ‘media influences for fan obsession’ (Jenson; 92; 10) and these characterisations. The essay states that fans are ‘a response to the star system’ meaning that ‘passivity is ascribed to the fan…’ (Jenson; 92; 10) This essay seeks to explore just how true it is to say that fans are passive and ‘entirely convinced by media artifice’. An analysis of a site dedicated to the film star Ryan Phillippe, created by a fan, as well as references to others fan sites such those dedicated to James Dean will be used to help achieve this. The argument Ruddock has given in the question to this essay is a fairly strong one, and has been commented on by
Some topics in this essay:
Ryan Phillippe’, Cruel Intentions, Ryan Phillippe’s, Finsbury Park, Cause NRay, Ryan Phillippe, Joli Jenson, James Dean, Henry Jenkins, Ken Carpenter, james dean, fan site, garratt 94, ryan phillippe, fan culture, ‘fan fiction’, jenson 92 10, storey 2001, dean fan, ‘virtual marriage’, storey 2001 183, 2001 183, dean fan site, convinced media artifice’, james dean fan,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1821
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
