It is very obvious that most of the battle that juror #8 fought was the prejudices of the other jurors. Instead of a verdict being based on the facts and logic everyone just went with majority rule and did not think of the consequences of what might happen to the boy, which was life in prison or death. These issues are handled and challenged by Juror #8, instead of going along with the crowd and accepting the evidence as it was presented, he challenged everything. Since the boy was to be executed if found guilty his life was now in the hands of the jury and juror #8 reasoned that the least they could do was to talk about the

Some topics in this essay:
Twelve Angry, European Goddamn, juror #10, juror #8, juror #7, , juror #3, trying convince, tried prove, prejudice towards, mind juror, biased opinion, prejudice remarks,