A Critique Of Wesley J. Smith’s
On April 23, 2002, Wesley J. Smith, author of the book Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America, wrote a Guest Comment article for the National Review Online website. The article was entitled “Spinning Stem Cells: A Damning Reporting Pattern.” In this article Smith takes offence at what he sees as bias in the media regarding embryonic versus adult stem cell research. He believes the media bias exists in favor of embryonic stem cell research, “while in actuality, adult and alternative sources of stem cells have demonstrated brighter prospects.” Smith does well in proving his thesis, that the media in fact has a bias against the successes of adult stem cell research, utilizing the actuality of the lack of coverage they receive in the media.Smith begins his article citing two major triumphs in adult stem cell research that were overlooked by the main media conglomerates. He feels these successes were overlooked and cast aside by the media because embryonic stem cell studies have not been able to produce similar results. The adult stem cell protocols that were used benefited both Parkinson’s and Multiple Sclerosis patients. Though there are celebrity sufferers of Parkinson’s, Smith mentions that
In conclusion, I agree with Smith in so much as the media shows bias toward the small successes of embryonic research. The studies that he has brought to light were not accessible to me on the Internet, as I tried to find the articles he referred to, and failed, with the exception of the mice that were cured of diabetes. I believe Smith puts forth a valid argument. I found many articles on the Internet pertaining to embryonic stem cell research compared to fewer on adult stem cell research. I would recommend this article to anyone who is interested in focusing on media bias as it pertains to the stem cell research issue. Smith poses many good points as to why media has the bias that they do and the effect it can have on the future of adult stem cell research. Smith also brings to light the issue of who has the most money in his most recent article. He points out that the research company with the best public relations firm will have the most stories in the media, “Quite often, reporters don't find stories; stories find reporters. That is how PR firms make the big bucks; being paid quite handsomely to alert journalists to stories their clients' want covered.” In essence, it all comes down to who wants to spend money on research and who wants to spend money on advertising. I find this very poignant, especially in our current advertisement driven society. According to Smith, while there have been tests conducted with adult stem cells on human beings, there have been none conducted on humans with embryonic stem cells. He states the reasons as “ES cells cause tumors… may be rejected by the immune system.” However, conversely, the adult stem cell research has been able to be performed due t
Some topics in this essay:
Review Online,
Cell Research”,
Reporting Pattern”,
According Smith,
University Gazette,
Parkinson’s Smith,
York Times,
stem cell,
stem cell research,
cell research,
Multiple Sclerosis,
adult stem,
adult stem cell,
embryonic stem,
media bias,
stem cells,
embryonic stem cell,
Guest Comment,
embryonic stem cells,
Lillge MD,
abortion debate,
research believes,
insulin production,
bias successes,
comment article national,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1159
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|