A Pro-Choice Argument Against Gilbert Meilander
For the past decade the subject of abortion has been a hot topic for debate worldwide. It has quickly joined the ranks of race and war as one of the most debated controversial subjects, however, it is very clear that an agreement will never occur. When the issues of human emotion, morality and law are all thrown together and a solid decision is to be made disagreements and even violence abound. All because someone decided to make abortion not simply a matter of choice, but a matter of morals which has led to a massive debate over a subject that should never have been questioned in the first place. An anonymous author of an online pro-choice article states that “every woman in America has the right to decide what to do with their bodies. No government or group of people should feel that they have the right to dictate to a person what path their life should take.” Still, there are two sides to every argument and Gilbert Meilander holds a strong position using Catholic morality and moral thought as his defense. Arguing emotion and basic human rights against Religious ethics is a tough battle simply for the reason that its tough to argue and reason with the word of God as interpreted by a religious scholar. In addition, it appe
Meilander’s writing centers around “two essential elements at the core of the traditional Catholic view,” those being (1) An affirmation of the equal rights of every human life to protection; and (2) Justification of indirect killing in some (but not all) cases where life conflicts with equal life. He also feels that Catholic moral thought does at times conflict with our most basic human intuitions “and seems to consider insufficiently the fact that the ‘nature’ we know is disordered and cannot be equated with ‘creation’ as it comes from the hand of the Creator.” Meilander also adds that those abortions that Catholic teaching does allow are firmly limited to a meticulously prepared set of cases and “thereby avoiding the danger of justifying more than we had originally intended.” In summary, according to Catholic teaching abortion its self is to be condoned unless the situation fits into the situations set aside by the church, e.g. if carrying the baby to full term will directly affect the mother’s health or even cause her death. Pro-lifers are also out to get laws passed that would make abortion illegal, it seems as though they fight their fight and argue their points but have little to no thought of what will become of the child and the mother’s future. It is a very good point that abortion should not be used as a means of contraception. On the other hand, what would happen if a mother weren’t able to get an abortion because it was illegal and she had to carry her baby to term? Chances are she would not proactively search, much less pay for prenatal care, she may drink do drugs, or anything else she could do to possibly harm the life of her baby.
Some topics in this essay:
Creator” Meilander,
Gilbert Meilander,
,
catholic moral,
gilbert meilander,
baby term,
life child,
catholic teaching,
woman’s choice,
abortion illegal,
word god,
basic human,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1138
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
